Can Hikaru beat Magnus Carlsen at World Championship2015????

Sort:
KM378
EZXDragon wrote:

Fast thinking doesn't mean accuracy. Or endgame skill. And half of bullet are time wins. lol THE LOGIC

Exactly!

Aliggator

your comments are not logic

Aliggator

you can watch Hikaru,s won Howmany of them was time winner???

PrestigiousEclipse
Becky_the_Stabber wrote:

Troll confirmed

Troll confirmed? +1 ! ;)

PrestigiousEclipse

The forums have been filled with so much logic lately. (Not) Foot in Mouth

Aliggator

i don,t know what is troll!

just i know your comment aren,t logicMoney Mouth

Aliggator

Hikaru is best and he will beat M.Carlsen

KM378

So, if you're so sure about that, why are you asking for other people's opinions?

PrestigiousEclipse

Troll much. Okay I will stop feeding the troll. I hope everyone does the same.

Diakonia
EZXDragon wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Aliggator wrote:

A Bullet raiting is very important beacuse just a Grand Genius can get a raiting more than 3100

Great analogy...3100+ bullet rating, has never beaten the world champion.  lets hear it for bullet!  

Ok...if you enjoy bullet then carry on, but dont act like a chess.com bullet rating is the determining factor for a world championship.  

Naka couldnt even beat Carlsen in the speed chess championship.

Naka is a great player but I agree.

I like Naka too, and would love to see him and Carlsen face off for the title, but its looking like there may be some Marshall vs. Capablanca stuff going on here.  

PrestigiousEclipse

Exactly the same thing going here Diakonia.

KM378
Diakonia wrote:
EZXDragon wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Aliggator wrote:

A Bullet raiting is very important beacuse just a Grand Genius can get a raiting more than 3100

Great analogy...3100+ bullet rating, has never beaten the world champion.  lets hear it for bullet!  

Ok...if you enjoy bullet then carry on, but dont act like a chess.com bullet rating is the determining factor for a world championship.  

Naka couldnt even beat Carlsen in the speed chess championship.

Naka is a great player but I agree.

I like Naka too, and would love to see him and Carlsen face off for the title, but its looking like there may be some Marshall vs. Capablanca stuff going on here.  

I agree.

PrestigiousEclipse

Caruana Naka or So would be awesome. Anand Aronian Topalov. Honsetly anyone!

Aliggator
KM378 wrote:

So, if you're so sure about that, why are you asking for other people's opinions?

I am %75 sure

PrestigiousEclipse

Lol

Aliggator
EZXDragon wrote:

Caruana Naka or So would be awesome. Anand Aronian Topalov. Honsetly anyone!

if they are awesome they could be higher than Hikaru

PrestigiousEclipse

what does that even mean?

KM378

Aliggator, we get your point. There's no need to repeat it a thousand times. People have the right to have their own opinions. By the way, bullet chess and standard chess are two different things.

Aliggator

Smile

PrestigiousEclipse

Yep this forum is just a repitition of him ,and everyone else. I hope KM378's comment clears things up.