Sure, you can be a CM.
You're only 13, so if you keep playing and learning you'll get there eventually.
It's not guaranteed, but it's very possible.
WHAT IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A CAT!? Are you really the president_max we all missed?
actually no one missed president_max tbh.
Sure, you can be a CM.
You're only 13, so if you keep playing and learning you'll get there eventually.
It's not guaranteed, but it's very possible.
WHAT IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A CAT!? Are you really the president_max we all missed?
actually no one missed president_max tbh.
yup he was an easy target
lol. I really missed President. Especially his "ego run" on Best On Chess.com!
you will need a lot of study and practice in order to improve its very hard now in the age of computers where people memorize several lines
That is true.
For example, I play only one variation of one particular and analyse with Stockfish multiple times , and those SF' opening moves becomes very familiar day by day. In some variations. In some variations , I can play exactly identical 3500+ strength SF moves up to move 12, move 15 etc.
Most of chess games are already decisive at move 30, move 40. If I can play 15 extremely strong moves out of 30 moves, my chance of losing is significantly reduced. This way I try to improve my strength.
You guys bettter talk when you reach my 2000+ blitz level. I will never blame a GM' preparation cos I havent reach his level.
No offense towards drmrboss, but an online 2000 blitz rating cannot be the benchmark of success???
Tournaments (games ) are not the best way to access a player' success, but there is no better way to access than competitive games. Try yourself to be 2000+ in blitz and see how strong the other players are (2000+ is the top 1-2% of rating pool in chess.com)
It is a requirement for a player to perform excellently in the tournaments to be eligible for Titles (Titles cant be claimed by writing chess thesis papers/books )
Likewise, exams are not the best way to access a student performance, but there is no better way to access a student' performance than exams.
Why don't you try to employ in a real tournament your theory about 15 perfect engine moves.
And then, if you have the courage show us the games. We all need a good laugh.
I did play OTB in my university life. Well, this statistics says, 2050 blitz is comparable to 2026 Fide. If I play OTB, I will perform around 2000+/- 100 rating.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.chess.com/amp/article/chesscom-rating-comparisons
You have to know that people dont get those rating by talk but by skill.
You are the only one who is laughable cos you never achieved 2000+ or you dont know how strong these people are.( compared with your lower rating)
If you think you are strong OTB, link your 2000+ FIDE rating.
Sure, you can be a CM.
You're only 13, so if you keep playing and learning you'll get there eventually.
It's not guaranteed, but it's very possible.
WHAT IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A CAT!? Are you really the president_max we all missed?