First, it is a nice way to learn openings. In Daily games you are allowed to use a book or database. I recommend you to use both. Follow the recommendations by the author and as soon as your opponent deviate you use a database to see what other players have done in this line. One database is ChessBase Online, another is chessgames.com. If you don’t have a repertoire, go to Chessable and buy one (one repertoire as white, one as white). I cannot understand why a lot of players don’t use a database to go through the opening phase.
Second, you have time to think and analyse (without an engine, of course), so use this time to think and analyse. Before you make a move, be sure that you consider all sensible next moves by your opponent. Go through these lines, be sure that your move is strong and there is no immediate refutation by your opponent, and save your analyses. You can make notes about your plans, so you will remember what you was thinking. I do not write notes anymore, but I spend so much time analysing the games that I usually know exactly what is going on in ny games. There are some difficult positions where you have to spend 30 minutes or longer to find a good move. In really complex positions I spent 4 hours in one move. This is the way how strong people play, or people who want to get stronger.
In my experience there are few cheaters in Daily Chess, as our games are full of inaccuracies and mistakes. Chess.com detected very quick cheaters, even if they use an engine only for one or two moves. I know a guy who was banned because he played two moves with the help of an engine. So, don’t be afraid of cheaters.
Play perhaps three or four games simultaneously, but not more. Exception: tournaments. There you have usually to play against more opponents.
Good luck!
This is great, thank you!
No I’m not, I’m just saying becoming better is different to making more effort.
Someone 1,800 taking 2 days playing through all lines on the analysis board and referencing endgame books and master games is a worse player than someone the same rating that isn’t using aids or taking much time.
Well I I could use the same argument for a lot of things in chess: Somebody who is thinking a lot in rapid games is worst than a guy with the same rating who blitz his moves etc.
Of course but that’s time management, not using things that aren’t allowed in a proper chess game.
И чё это вам даёт?😐
In English he's saying, "and what does this give you?" At least I think that's roughly it.