Carlsen only wishes......... - Chess Forums - Page 12

letsgohome · 2013-11-21T14:11:01-08:00

.....that he could only be as good as I am in his first year of playing. On a relative basis, I have indeed a better understanding than Carlsen could even have imagined in his first year of playing chess. I have transcended all of his goals and abilities given the same measurement of time, being our

waffllemaster

Nov 22, 2013

0

#221

letsgohome wrote:

waffllemaster wrote:

masansr wrote:

You don't study openings? Too bad, you won't get any further than 1500 or so. Anyone with some skill and knowledge will wipe the floor with you. Pattern recognition is only one of the importaint things for a chess player.

Naa. Very limited and basic opening prep (no opening books and very little memorization) can take you to 1800-2000 USCF comfortably... of course this means you're not playing Najdorfs and such.

I'm not saying that's a good or bad way, just that openings are very low on the list of necessities.

do you agree that reading or studying too early can be dertrimental to a young chess player?

Detrimental in what way? Not to their chess. It may be bad psychologically depending on their personality and how much the parents are willing to control their life.

letsgohome

Nov 22, 2013

0

#222

waffllemaster wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

waffllemaster wrote:

Chessislife2013 wrote:

OK, that's strange... Search Burrell, Michael.

Wow, you're doing really well, good luck in the future.

What is his rating?

You can search yourself :p

It's still provisional, but like he said he's doing very well for his first year. After 4 or 5 G/30 scholastic tournaments it's 1500.

Wow good job Mike and keep it up it is quite impressive.

letsgohome

Nov 22, 2013

0

#223

And thinks wafflemaster for posting it

enprise1234

Nov 22, 2013

0

#224

So you made this OP to get advice on how to improve? Seems like you already have a routine of no study and not reviewing your games. What else are you asking for?

letsgohome

Nov 22, 2013

0

#225

idimayuga wrote:

So you made this OP to get advice on how to improve? Seems like you already have a routine of no study and not reviewing your games. What else are you asking for?

Well for starters. I feel that my middle game is above average in the 1400- 1600, but I do suffer a little at end game. That is the ONLY weakness in just playing and not analyzing from your previous games, what should i be looking for when considering going to an endgame. Or what is an advantageous end game to a disadvantageous endgame. Your feedback is important thank you

enprise1234

Nov 22, 2013

0

#226

Magnus coach in the beginning GM Agdestein recommended he read Fundamental Chess Endings. But you don't study so the advice is useless for you. On a second note you've taken away attention from a true achievement today.

jhatchuel

Nov 22, 2013

0

#227

letsgohome a écrit :

jhatchuel wrote:

OK number 1 advice, stop acting like a fraternity house bro when you probably didn't even make it to college.

What is college brah?

Not the sharpest tool in the shed, this guy...

Dude_3

Nov 22, 2013

0

#228

letsgohome wrote:

Dude_3 wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

Dude_3 wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

Dude_3 wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

no limit,

$5000 perpetuity- real monetary value( thus adjusted for inflation) to me, once I get NM status, If GM than $20,000 perpetuity- RMV

NM instead of GM

$1000 present value to you ONLY if I stop trying to reach NM

accept?

I have no doubt that you will pretend to try to reach NM until your last breath, so 1000 to me in 10 years. Your other terms are accepted for this counter offer.

If there is a limit then what I owe you becomes $0.01. Your choice brah no limit $1000 or limit $0.01. That is my final offer

No limit, however, continuing to strive for NM is considered as playing online games 200+ times a month, reading 3 chess books a month, and competing in at least 2 money prize non-scholastic u-2300 tournaments a month.

These conditions become mandatory only once I reach 2650 on live standard chess.com

2150, and your not allowed to play on other sites.

2555 on chess.com and you have to pay for ALL my expenses at ANY chess tournament. A chess tournament is where more than 6 players compete. Your silence is tacit compliance to the stipulated terms of the contract brah

My silence is constrewed as me having a life outside this thread.

Dude_3

Nov 22, 2013

0

#229

helltank wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

helltank wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

helltank wrote:

Carlsen only wishes....

... that Chess.com has a test to filter out idiots....

well, im in the top 91 percentile brah on live standard, so I would past brah. Get your ratings up brah with hard work you can accomplish anything. I truly believe in your abilities. And in this world of withheld permissions may you fly higher my future chess rating brah.

That may well be true, except for the fact that you're too stupid to get into the top 91 percentile. Therefore, you must be lying.

lmao. buy a membership and go to my stats brah. LOL, yes I am lying and no one brought it up but you. LOL. So you are saying that you are smarter than the over 1000 people that have seen this thread. LOL

No, they didn't bring it up because they're having the time of their life mocking you in the thread.

The first intelligent thing anyone said this whole thread.

Dude_3

Nov 22, 2013

0

#230

letsgohome wrote:

Oh sorry, I will bump your mark only 2%, so now you have a 40%.

Paragraph one-- you get some marks for understanding that I was using the word facts unsubstantially. Partial credit, since I wanted you to get to the conclusion. But is it a blanant conclusion that anybody could have gotten.

Paragraph two is wrong, for I clearly stated that a year after he was introduced to chess and NOT comparing him to my age. LOL. I will be nice and not give you a demerit.

Paragraph 3--> Topic sentence is completely wrong, for you STILL used your intuition as the premise of your argument and did not bring any facts. LOL

Therefore, I can only conclude that your are making improvments, but still seem not to understand the material. I want a signature from both your parents young woman that they have seen your grade.

I am sure that he is euphoric at getting such an abysmal grade from a simpleton such as you.

Dude_3

Nov 22, 2013

0

#231

letsgohome wrote:

BMeck wrote:

Lets play unrated

You are too weak of a player brah. I'm sorry thats just the facts brah. And you still have not answered the questions.

You are so mentally incompetent that you cannot seem to notice that his rating is just a few points below yours. I'm sure you will be happy to know that i have taken on your moronic habit of giving people grades from a probable high school dropout, and while I am not a high school dropout and will never be, i will give you your grade of %20 on having at least 1 argument, %0 on mental intelligence, and %100 on stupid use of womens clothing. As i said, don't buy brahs unless your a girl brah.

T9P1

Nov 23, 2013

0

#232

Dude_3 hat geschrieben:

letsgohome wrote:

BMeck wrote:

Lets play unrated

You are too weak of a player brah. I'm sorry thats just the facts brah. And you still have not answered the questions.

You are so mentally incompetent that you cannot seem to notice that his rating is just a few points below yours. I'm sure you will be happy to know that i have taken on your moronic habit of giving people grades from a probable high school dropout, and while I am not a high school dropout and will never be, i will give you your grade of %20 on having at least 1 argument, %0 on mental intelligence, and %100 on stupid use of womens clothing. As i said, don't buy brahs unless your a girl brah.

Best comment in this whole thread :D I give you a grade of 100%

letsgohome

Nov 23, 2013

0

#233

Dude_3 wrote:

letsgohome wrote:

BMeck wrote:

Lets play unrated

You are too weak of a player brah. I'm sorry thats just the facts brah. And you still have not answered the questions.

You are so mentally incompetent that you cannot seem to notice that his rating is just a few points below yours. I'm sure you will be happy to know that i have taken on your moronic habit of giving people grades from a probable high school dropout, and while I am not a high school dropout and will never be, i will give you your grade of %20 on having at least 1 argument, %0 on mental intelligence, and %100 on stupid use of womens clothing. As i said, don't buy brahs unless your a girl brah.

LMAO. Am I the one who is truly mentally incompetent? LOL go look at his live standard rating and then think of reply. Your own words were your downfall.

BMeck

Nov 23, 2013

0

#234

Still waiting for a challenge little boy

letsgohome

Nov 23, 2013

0

#235

idimayuga wrote:

Magnus coach in the beginning GM Agdestein recommended he read Fundamental Chess Endings. But you don't study so the advice is useless for you. On a second note you've taken away attention from a true achievement today.

LMAO. This is my exact argument brah. You see you cannot explain in your own words( 50 or less) what is the difference between transitioning from a middlegame to an advantageous endgame or how to prevent yourself into ending up in a disadvantageous endgame brah.

You will have no choice, but to refer me to a book since you have do not have any basic or fundamental understanding of endgame in itself. LMAO. Which is a shame, since ones who reference books to others usually have read it themselves. I am for asking for an impromptu answer not an answer that is verbatim from a chess book.

Your counter argument ( since you know i am right)- You are going to tell me to read it myself. LMAO right, you see i know what you are thinking lol.

letsgohome

Nov 23, 2013

0

#236

BMeck wrote:

Still waiting for a challenge little boy

still waiting for those answers lol

letsgohome

Nov 23, 2013

0

#237

Your second statement about Carlsen not getting the notice he deserves because of my little thread is actually funny. For you give me way too much credit for how can a nobody like me detract from Carlsen's accomplishments. Secondly, on a deeper level why do you think I chose this title. The title is satirical, so that people would bring up and appreciate Carlsen's impressive resume in comparing him to me, which they did, like bringing horses to water brah, lol.

BMeck

Nov 24, 2013

0

#238

letsgohome wrote:

BMeck wrote:

Still waiting for a challenge little boy

still waiting for those answers lol

You afraid, I understand. I would wash you up

TitanCG

Nov 24, 2013

0

#239

TitanCG

Nov 24, 2013

0

#240