Carlsen v. Anand: Where was the blunder?

In the recent world championship match, Indian Anand Viswanathan made a blunder against Magnus Carlsen, at least what was rumored.

However, I do not think such an action even arose.

And if an action did not arise, then it is without intrinsic nature. And since it is unarisen, it did not perish... so Viswanathan did not blunder past tense.

If the action were something with intrinsic nature, then it would eternal, and the action would be undone, for nothing that is eternal could have been "done."

Well, if the action weren't done, then there is the concern that there would be a result of the game, of an action in the game which was not done. 

And then there follows the fault of incontinence.

Without doubt this would contradict all worldly conduct. And it would not be correct to distinguish between those who have played well and those who have played badly, as in the case with Viswanathan and Carlsen!

And that action that has already matured will produce a birth of something yet again, if it follows from the action's being determinate that it is endowed with an intrinsic nature. 

I know it's a long explanation but I just want to be clear, where exactly was Anand Viswanathan's blunder?

Just you can tell me where, thanks you

Look, seriously, I just don't understand. Maybe you could help please!

People say that action is by nature defiled and the defilements are not ultimately real. 

If the defilements are not real though, how would action be ultimately real?

And if action and the defilements are empty, then what is to be said of the body?

Maybe the person who is enclosed in ignorance and bound by thirst, that person is the enjoyer. But that one is neither someone other than the agent nor someone identical with the agent.......

Since the action does not depends on conditions and does not exist having sprung up without dependence on conditions, therefore the agent also does not exist. 

And if there is neither action nor agent, how would there be something born of the action, such as a bad game, in Viswanathan's case??

Morever, if the game doesn't exist, how will there be people who saw it like us???

defilement is a concept, not an action. 

correct is whatever is meritorious, duh

Sir can you just tell me where was the blunder then, thanks you

mabye we can see the game you are talking about if you post it

Sage.

guys i do not know the game just there was some big mistake i heard

He's just trolling and so is being intentionally vague about things and pulling gobbledy-gook from a Buddist website.  That's where the "defilements" stuff originates.

Kind of a lazy way to troll.  Be original.

I heard a rumor that blunder has carlsened.

no i am sure it was viswanathan who blunder.

also it is not buddist, may be they say something but it is strict viswanathan. i am from india, you racist

I doubt that ;).  Enjoy your brief stint on the forums before you get caught for engine use...

 Yes its the game six where Magnus took the lead again and the most critical of the series. First Magnus blunders with 26.Kd2 and Vishy misses 26...Nxe5 that gives advantage to black.

thanks you bg5. 

its exactly what i was looking for.

and i am not engine, i am a old master

but how do you know the action (the blunder) really arose... maybe everything you see is a dream

Someday I ll wake up from this dream but the double blunder will still be there hunting Anand as a terrible knightmare. It's not an ordinary mistake a 2200 rated player will fall in, it's the definition of what blunders mean in a final match and for amateurs like us , yes it looks like a dream!

Trash, I think you're the dream and none of what you haven't written is real. Now I'm going back to sleep and I just hope that I don't dream again that I dreamt that you actually existed.