Check Spamming

Sort:
KingCobra280
Martin_Stahl wrote:
millerd66 wrote:
SpacePodz wrote:
So I should just lose instead of exploiting the fact that my opponents king is open and going for a draw? Also, even if it’s not a draw, checking gets you better a better position. Legit ask ANY professional or high ranking player and they will say repetitive checking is a valid strategy.
 
repetitive checking is one thing but doing the same check over and over that is easily refuted is futile 

 

 

You are free to deviate from your repeated refutation as well. If that happens to be the only refutation, then you should continue to play it and if your opponent's checking is the best plan, they should continue as well and secure the draw.

 

The whole point is to play the best moves in the position, or the best moves you can find. Sometimes the best moves are to repeat.

I agree with Martin thumbup.png

KingCobra280
pulyavzubah wrote:

Америка это ошибка, огромная ошибка.

Зигмунд Фрейд

???

who is Sigmund Freud

x-2241106434

Its necessary on bullet chess

x-2241106434

and its not dirty

 

neatgreatfire
I_Just_Rizzed_You_Up wrote:

Spam checkers are mad annoying they literally cant come up with any other plan so they do that to draw. Its extremely unfair in my  opinion like you earned being up in material and now theyre just gonna spam check to draw? Its extremely rude too like the fact that they dont have the decentsy to accept that they played worse annoys me so much. Just accept your loss it is not a tactic its just being desperate to not lose rating points. Imagine a rating increasing just because they had no plan so all they did was spam check. Mad annoying and disrespectful and shows what kind of terrible player/sore loser they are. I notice most players do this in desperation cuz they know they are gonna lose when a passed pawn is about to reach and is defended anyways so they cant win back the pawn so they just check and check and check. That is what seems the most ridiculous and unfair to me when they know they deserve to lose so they just do it over and over because theyre selfish and cant accept that they played worse and deserved to lose. There should be some rules to prevent spam checkers or ban them somehow. They are ruining an amazing game.

You could try not messing up and allowing them to draw.

Antonin1957

People who complain because their opponent won't resign when they think said opponent should resign, people who make up a term like "spam checking" and argue that opponents should be punished for it when checking is the main goal of this game...wow. I keep thinking I have heard everything on this forum, but I guess I haven't.

OpeningMaster33
Antonin1957 wrote:

People who complain because their opponent won't resign when they think said opponent should resign, people who make up a term like "spam checking" and argue that opponents should be punished for it when checking is the main goal of this game...wow. I keep thinking I have heard everything on this forum, but I guess I haven't.

It's like people on a play money poker site complaining about pre-flop raising because most of them are calling stations lol. The whole point of that game is get more money in the pot when you have a good hand haha.

ViperousTony

Every single opponent I play is always a check spammer. If there is a check available they always check no matter what grin.png Must be an effective strategy because its damn annoying

blueemu

New complaint :

No fair! My opponent is thinking! Can't he be banned for that?