Chess and Poker, a strange logic?

I’m good in both of them, but I don’t see a correlation between them. Clearly in both of them you have to think before move or before betting/calling, but that’s the case in many aspects of life.

I believe Poker involves more diverse skills than chess: your emotion, dealing with randomness (sometimes unfair randomness), reading others mind, and similar to chess certain type of calculation. In chess we don’t face bluffs as often as in poker, even if we face a bluff we can calculate it and have a good understanding whether to call it or not. In poker, if your opponent bluffs your best chance is to decide based on the hand history (which you should somehow memorize and you don’t need that in chess) or based on the flow of the game.

I assert that no way I’m professional in either, I won some cheap tournaments at poker and for chess I play online only and you can see that I’m good.

I don't know any online casino that requires some logic to lose money.

There are grandmasters who are professional poker players. I can recall Grischuk and Kosteniuk.

When looking for a reliable platform for betting on football, security and transparency are important. Personally, I like one site because it has long established itself as a reliable and stable choice for those who are fond of betting. The online platform has a good reputation among users and what is important, they really care about the transparency of their services. It is easy to understand even for a beginner. The platform also provides the opportunity to bet on many sporting events around the world, which adds variety.