how does chesscom do its ratings this sht is ridiculous
there is no way to predict any kind of playing ability using ratings
i am not usually surprised by my opponent in real chess with real ratings, because they work.
here are some games. First two are against a 1700+ daily opponent who accepted my challenge when i was rated only 1200. The third one is from a fckin 1100 rated player. The 4th and 5th are from a 1500. it is crazy how bad the chess.com rating system is. Both players BTW have played a decent number of games in total so u would think it would be accurate
Games from 1700+:
Game from 1100+:
Games from "1500"+:
wow i cannot believe it. i use my opponents ratings to save my time. i only spend like 5 secs per move usually on a 1100, maybe a lot more for a 1700. that is BS
Well, you are 89-0 and now rated 2045, so it is not surprising you would find lower rated players less than challenging.
You haven't played anyone rated 1700 or above.
Why don't you skip ahead and try a few 2000+ rated players?
how does chesscom do its ratings this sht is ridiculous
there is no way to predict any kind of playing ability using ratings
i am not usually surprised by my opponent in real chess with real ratings, because they work.
here are some games. First two are against a 1700+ daily opponent who accepted my challenge when i was rated only 1200. The third one is from a fckin 1100 rated player. The 4th and 5th are from a 1500. it is crazy how bad the chess.com rating system is. Both players BTW have played a decent number of games in total so u would think it would be accurate
Games from 1700+:
Game from 1100+:
Games from "1500"+:
wow i cannot believe it. i use my opponents ratings to save my time. i only spend like 5 secs per move usually on a 1100, maybe a lot more for a 1700. that is BS