thanks for the avalanche of replies, I forgot it's a children's forum these days and people only reply to nonsense, threads that look incredibly popular with lots of posts but really it's just two or three kids going back and forth posting juvenile rubbish for hours and hours and days and days on end
Chess.com's accuracy v Outside Source's accuracy - which is Correct?
Sort:
6 days ago
0
#3
RoadRunnerRage wrote:
In my last game to reach 1900 Blitz
https://www.chess.com/game/live/139779621558?move=0
The chess.com analysis shows on my profile that the accuracy was 81.2%, and my opponents was 74.9 %
Yet using an outside website called wintrchess, shows my accuracy was 93.7% and my opponents was 89.5%
Can anyone tell me which one exactly is accurate, I imagine it's chess.com's analysis and not the freebee version telling me it's higher, if thats the case the guy running the site is raking in a lot of ad revenue conning people and the site is made up numbers and is rubbish.
Accuracy here is not a direct engine correlation algorithm so comparing it to other sources is going to be somewhat different.
https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8708970-how-is-accuracy-in-analysis-determined
In my last game to reach 1900 Blitz
https://www.chess.com/game/live/139779621558?move=0
The chess.com analysis shows on my profile that the accuracy was 81.2%, and my opponents was 74.9 %
Yet using an outside website called wintrchess, shows my accuracy was 93.7% and my opponents was 89.5%
Can anyone tell me which one exactly is accurate, I imagine it's chess.com's analysis and not the freebee version telling me it's higher, if thats the case the guy running the site is raking in a lot of ad revenue conning people and the site is made up numbers and is rubbish.