it's actually really hard to beat a computer in 1 min. chess. Beating the 2000 rated one is already a large challenge, because computers play really fast.
yea
it's actually really hard to beat a computer in 1 min. chess. Beating the 2000 rated one is already a large challenge, because computers play really fast.
yea
well, they could be good for rapid training and it will be a large challenge in blitz, but whatever you do, DON'T TRY PLAYING THEM IN BULLET. When I was a 1600 bullet player, I literally lost to a 800 computer!
well, they could be good for rapid training and it will be a large challenge in blitz, but whatever you do, DON'T TRY PLAYING THEM IN BULLET. When I was a 1600 bullet player, I literally lost to a 800 computer!
2/1 is fine. 1/0 and lower is HECK
well, they could be good for rapid training and it will be a large challenge in blitz, but whatever you do, DON'T TRY PLAYING THEM IN BULLET. When I was a 1600 bullet player, I literally lost to a 800 computer!
2/1 is fine. 1/0 and lower is HECK
You can't challenge a computer to any time control under 1 min
but I just can't imagine playing one in 30 sec. That would probably be crazy... But, if you play a weird move like h4-h5 against a really high computer like stockfish they will 5 sec. to think so maybe that is a partial reason they don't allow it. Just a theory of course
but I just can't imagine playing one in 30 sec. That would probably be crazy... But, if you play a weird move like h4-h5 against a really high computer like stockfish they will 5 sec. to think so maybe that is a partial reason they don't allow it. Just a theory of course
too fast
Wei
Don't be fooled by Wei's smile! She's looking to knock you out from move one!
martin also cant checkmate if you play fools mate