@IronSteam1
Now you are thinking.
Let's say we average the distance between a tennis court and a golf court.
The racket can defect golf balls, if need be.
Even if the golf ball punch a hole in the racket, as sword the racket is still functional in another dimension.
At close quarters, the tennis player can serve a ball in the direction of the golfer ala a shuriken, and move in for close quarters combat.
A golfer is used to hit a stationary ball.
A tennis player is used to hit a moving ball, from any direction. A tennis player has better distance and timing, and more variety of strokes.
I'm betting on the tennis player.
Also a tennis racket is defense and offensive. It has a surface to act like a shield, even if a whole is punched in it.
You are dreaming. A tennis racket is no defense against a well struck golf ball. Ever seen a saguaro cactus on a golf course pierced by golf balls?
And now you are talking about close quarter combat?? How many people have been killed by a tennis racket? Now, how many people have been killed by a golf club?
I think the reason you would bet on the tennis player is because you prefer to be habitually wrong.
Donald Trump plays golf. If it is a sport, then Ben Finegold no longer stands as evidence against the claim that chess is.
that is illogical on so many levels...
Partly, I agree, which was the point.
Nonetheless, in most threads on this topic, someone brings up Ben Finegold as evidence that chess cannot be a sport. I merely note that if such an argument holds any water, then Trump’s golfing prowess should be held against golf.