im atempting to get a highter rating but iv halft it through me creer
Chess rating system
Sort:
mznor wrote:
In playing my first game on Chess.com, I received a rating of 1200, before I played. Why, and how was that arrived at?
QUOC VIET CO., LTD
Our company offers Professional materials, materials for industry Shoes & Garments and furniture: Tapes Korea, Farafin wax, ink, alcohol industry, daydai, oil immersion only, painting pu, wood glue, brushes, glue brushes scans, stone grinding, rough grinding, bread still charges created on the surface of iron wood, silver and other kinds of writing motors, industrial machinery, conveyors, industrial chemical , electrical equipment ...
Manufactured goods produced in metal, hand-held tools, all kinds of industrial brushes, all kinds of charges grinding wheel, iron wheel charges still make wooden surface ...
very pleased to cooperate !
CONTACTS
No. 19 Road 212,District 9, HCMC CITY ,VIETNAMESE
Tel / Fax: +84 086 288 12 58; +84 0989 30 40 11
Email : quocviet.manufacturing.hcm@gmail.com
ichabod801 wrote:
General-Lee wrote:
The queen is worth nine you imbecile!
You realize you just called Philidor, Euwe, and Lasker (among others) imbeciles, right?
He is not an imbecile. My non-internet father taught me 10 too. 9 is assigned by chess.com. It's all relative. I've seen a queen look like a mere 1 point. You have too.
How can you find your Rating Deviation? I'm guessing that the default rating range that is shown when you start a new game is based on this. Is it twice your RD (i.e. within the 95% confindence interval)? Or is it something larger?
It's only available to premium members under the "see full stats" link above the summary statistics on your main page. Yours is currently 199.
this site is garbage
why why why did you attack chesspark.com
your site is garbage.chess.com
fight me!
TheGrobe wrote:
It's only available to premium members under the "see full stats" link above the summary statistics on your main page. Yours is currently 199.
Thanks. The default rating range for seeks (for me) is +/-300. Is this standard for everyone?
colfk wrote:
this site is garbage
why why why did you attack chesspark.com
your site is garbage.chess.com
fight me!
Maybe you should direct this towards the former management of chesspark.com who decided that they no longer wanted to be, or were capable of being, in a position to support their site and their user base. The alternative was to simply shutter the site and leave all of the users to find their own alternative but chesspark.com was going either way and that was a decision of their management not this site's. Your frustration is misdirected.
From what I've seen, every attempt has been made to provide at least some degree of continuity and to provide a free place for you to continue to play chess. I'd urge you to give this site a chance as it's truly a great place to play and interact with other chess players.
Can we attack Red Hot Pawn next? They had some interesting looking tournament structures.
i think the best way is not to show rating until the end of the game ...so that average player like me start to play their best everytime . rating makes u underestimate below average opponent and end up making 60 move when u only need 30 + move to beat him or end up losing . once u knew your opponent is 1500 or so .it doesnt matter losing or winning ..suddently ..we play better than we were .making some creative attack and compact defence . so if we dont know what rating is our opponent is .we might play our best all the games .
ratings ratings ratings
somebody know what hap........ whit server???????????????
its the average
I think you start at 1200 because at the begining you lose a lot and they don't want you to get too low like 2 or 3 hundred. And you lose a lot of points at the begining to.
Feb 12, 2010
0
#556
oceaneyes wrote:
AlecKeen wrote: Becca wrote: Rating has its place but its not the most important thing. Sometimes you can lose a game on time and it will seriously affect your rating this has nothing to do with how well you play.
Oh yes it does! How well you play includes how well you manage your time. Time is as much part of Chess as it is in other games. In football you could score the greatest goal in history, but if the referee blows time before it goes in it doesn't count. Similarly in Chess if you don't get your moves in within the time, you lose, and correctly so.
So basically what you're saying is:
Football is a game. Football is timed.
Chess is also a game. Therefore, chess should also be timed.
You've got me convinced.
What's your solution ? Give infinite time and wait until universe collapses ? :-D
After you play 100 games your rating willnot be that much affected from a single loss.
Join TDT:
-> http://www.chess.com/groups/join.html?id=4124
Feb 18, 2010
0
#558
Yes that is the advantage of ECF ratings as well the more game you play the less you rating will get affected by one loss to a lower graded player????? However, I have become a little grade obsessed now and then but after all it is just a number sometimes ........ sometimes you have to go backwards to go forwards .... i know this is a little cliche .... so please ignore if you disagree
to be fair...what a rubbish topic
hey just got kicked out of live chess. im a little new to this and i think i said the wrong thing and got kicked out. Does anybody know a way to get back in. lesson learned..