chess ryle

Sort:
cera071

you need to change the rule of repeating the move. This is not in accordance with the chess rule. Read better and see ... this is where both players use two fields. In case you have three or more fields to play and one player uses two fields to extract Remi it is wrong. Change this necessarily

batgirl
cera071 wrote:

Read better and see .

I'm trying.

cera071

A remi that you get by repeating the move ... here the weaker players use to repeat the gesture of extortion remake even though they have the ability to play because they put the software in chess.com.that is wrong because it is not in accordance with Chess rules

president_max

Is this about draw by perpetual check or triple repetition of position?  Years of reading chess.com posts have helped me decipher worse codes.

cera071

yes

cera071

remi=draw

president_max
cera071 wrote:

yes

null

I'd like to thank chess.com for my insanely  fuzzy linguistic comprehension skills.

president_max
ReachOutGrabYa wrote:
cera071 wrote:

remi=draw

Good, so it doesn't mean ramming?

Good Lord the laborous fresh accounts that appear on labor day!  May day! May day!

cera071

so inspired, many would fall to their knees so that they can be as inspired as you are

Toohey_Dee

Good job Max! I couldn't quite make out what the OP was going on about.

omnipaul

I presume you are referring the the below game.  This game was correctly declared a draw by the rules.

One thing that is often misunderstood about the threefold repetition draw is that the required repetitions is of position, not of moves (which, I presume, is what you meant in your post by "fields").  In the game, the positions after moves 59. ... Qd4+, 61. ... Qd4+, and 67. ... Qd4+ are identical.  It doesn't matter that your king came to a4 from different locations or that the queen arrived at d4 from different locations or even that several moves were made between the second and third repetition. What matters is that the positions are identical.