I will tell you, however, that this:
:
<<And one style of perfect play. Could and would perform differently against the other non perfect chess players in the rating pool.>>
:
is complete and utter drivel. You have no argument to support what you say at all.
<<And one style of perfect play. Could and would perform differently against the other non perfect chess players in the rating pool.>>
:
Whereas I already pointed that out.
@Optimissed, you quoted the exact same text twice, first saying it was "complete and utter drivel" and then saying that you had "already pointed it out".
Frank self-criticism?
You all ignore the fact chess is already solved only because you have no access to the solution