I think I get it.
And - he'll probably copy this post too.
the guy with the s on the end wants people to report him ...
maybe hoping to get the forum locked?
Or maybe he's got something else in mind.
But everytime he does this
one could look up to my name to see the real post.
Worried?
No.
In chess we often try to figure the opponent's plan.
Its often fatal to fail to identify the reason for an opponent's move he's just made.
But here its nothing.
So maybe his plan is that people will mistakenly confuse the two postings - by conditioning them to believe they'll be the same.
Then - he'll doctor my post at a particular time.
He could do this with anyone ...
But which members would worry about my posts the most?
That one's not hard.
Anyway - tygxc is posting about the forum subject!
I don't think phony accounts and a single phony PM can prevent that.
Chess will never be solved, here's why
Possibly whatever the reason though it is just annoying
0
#10040
I think I get it.
And - he'll probably copy this post too.
the guy with the s on the end wants people to report him ...
maybe hoping to get the forum locked?
Or maybe he's got something else in mind.
But everytime he does this
one could look up to my name to see the real post.
Worried?
No.
In chess we often try to figure the opponent's plan.
Its often fatal to fail to identify the reason for an opponent's move he's just made.
So maybe his plan is that people will mistakenly confuse the two postings - by conditioning them to believe they'll be the same.
Then - he'll doctor my post at a particular time.
He could do this with anyone ..
At least he didn't copy everything completely 😭
I've edited my latest post since he copied it.
But that was to improve the post. Not to do with him.
I often edit posts to improve them.
And I delete posts too. For that purpose.
Many people are afraid to.
Posts aren't carved in stone.
Good idea but I think people wouldn't get confused it's pretty obvious due to the s at the end
Possibly whatever the reason though it is just annoying
I didn't say that at all.
Regarding 'annoying' one can simply choose to be not annoyed.
Its that simple.
But many often miss that or never discover it.
I didn't say that at all.
Regarding 'annoying' one can simply choose to be not annoyed.
Its that simple.
But many often miss that or never discover it.
This will go on until your imposter quits sigh...
This time I read BC's post.
Another 'sigh' BC.
You're slipping.
Again.
Lets see if s copies that one.
He probably wants to be reported so that staff look in here
This time I read BC's post.
Another 'sigh' BC.
You're slipping.
Again.
Lets see if s copies that one.
It's probably because he wants you reported but all you do is troll tho technically that's reportable but most people just ignore that
He missed 'He probably wants to be reported so that staff look in here'
I have no objection to anyone reporting him.
But remember - if he's banned or muted he can just make another one.
And unlike Reddit - chess.com has no one week posting rule.
Unfortunately.
Ideally - chess.com would put in an option for opening posters to pick how long an account has to be a chess.com account to post in their forums.
He missed 'He probably wants to be reported so that staff look in here'
I have no objection to anyone reporting him.
But remember - if he's banned or muted he can just make another one.
And unlike Reddit - chess.com has no one week posting rule.
Unfortunately.
Ideally - chess.com would put in an option for opening posters to pick how long an account has to be a chess.com account to post in their forums.
IF his object is to get me to read BC's posts ...
that one's going to continue to fail.
IF his object is to get me to read BC's posts ...
that one's going to fail.
Hey 's' - I edited it.
You left out the 'continue to fail
Why does his status say "me win you no chat" doesnt you blocking him mean he wins?