Chess will never be solved, here's why

Finding the best move is hard in some position. Even stockfish can be beat, just like it did by torch. It's scary how the best chess engines can be beat

no really, I thought it was a chair

"never"?

Kasparov said in the 80s "never a computer shall beat me"...

"never" always fails.
("always" also)

Theres a big difference tween a bunch of humans getting together to write a program that solves it. And one human life time ever being long enough for any certain player to solve it. I dont care if an engine solves it or not. Any human player would hafta live 10,000 years. The only 960 games i ever played were just an accident i didnt mean to sign up for. Why bother? Real chess is not played out. It never will be. Maybe for AI but not for human brains that only live to be about 80.

They are about there

https://www.iccf.com/event?id=100104

bro i thought you would have realized your mistakes by now. you're still on this?

86 perfect games and counting

this means absolutely nothing. there is no proof of their perfection, just as you haven't proved that black doesnt win every game under perfect play.

go ahead, provide the peer reviewed proof.

Doesn't matter. Chess is going to not only survive, but also thrive. We will have better players coming up and the top level chess getting bigger.

@9102

I doubt it. We are now at 100% draws in correspondence and are approaching 100% draws in classical. Carlsen does not even want to play the Classical World Championship.
I expect faster time controls: 90|30 classical and 15|10 rapid.

@9103

wheres the proof

That (Carlsen doesn't want to play) isn't an argument. 90/30 is too fast for a World Championship because it favours Carlsen's style of play. We can surmise that engines and computers aren't an environment which supports very strong players and that instead we have had rating inflation.

Aljens too think different about chess. Since devil wounded god and gave to them freedom they think different about chess. It is very difficult for human brain to solve a complicated position. I wonder if they will interfere by helping firouzja because his face is like devil once upon now dead their god warrior

Chess is a puzzle and so, it is solvable. You know why? Because of the "first move" which the white player is obliged to have. Because of this "First move" this gives the player opportunity to develop first. If both players constantly plays the best move the advantage points that white has will never go down but rather go up linearly until to the point it will be forced mate. And if you're asking "how about the brilliant moves? Doesn't that apply to the equation?". Then the answer to that is brilliant moves will not exist if a certain mistake in any point in the game has not been done.
Chess is just a puzzle because of the "First move". That's just it.
People make computers play chess to discover theories that would somehow help solve chess. But computers are made from us humans who has a limit. For now it is not solved but soon it will be. Chess is made from us human who has a limit. So, it must also have a certain limit where it could be solved.

It isn't solvable. If you don't believe me, read this thread.

We are about there. It is a draw.
https://www.iccf.com/event?id=100104

why do you continue to ignore how i completely disproved your arguments?

I don't think you can disprove the idea that chess is a draw. Maybe tygxc isn't the best arguer for unsolveability and you've shown up some faults there. I know he has some very odd ideas, often to do with some Russian GM called Sveshnikov and his nutty ideas.

In this context, tygxc is saying that we're very close to proving that chess is a draw. I accept that's possible but only in an inferential sense. Certainly not in a deductible way. Svesnikov's ideas about solving chess were not based on reality or on reason. I'm one of those who think they were more based on having drunk much too much.