Chess will never be solved, here's why

thats the only answer she can give cus she knows she's a cheater

Chess, like many other games and puzzles, has different layers of complexity and meaning depending on how you approach it. From a competitive standpoint, where the goal is to win, many argue that chess has been "solved" to some extent by top players who have mastered its strategies and tactics. However, if you view chess as a creative and infinite exploration of possibilities, then it can never truly be solved, as there will always be new positions and ideas to discover. So, whether chess is "solved" or not depends on your perspective and how you choose to engage with the game.

Bro you accuse everyone for being s cheater lmao

I don't think you know how to catch cheaters you just see "numbers go up" and clame cheater from what I can tell

I only call those who suspiciously look like a cheater.

superbikequeen not everyone in life is gonna be nice! grow up! you expect people to be real nice. but your a woman, so how are you going to understand.

Says the 15 or 16 year old troll?

not 16, she's the one complaining about about her hurt feelings.

i never complained of how i'm getting treated

Alles, was Sie Amerikaner können, ist, sich selbst zu bemitleiden.

I think you are because I'm starting to recognise you. I'm 73. You must have lost count during your previous incarnation here.

Anyway, you post like a 15 year old so why are you embarrassed??

I have pretty much proved you wrong.

You disproved a whole person? We mathematicians are limited to disproving objective propositions.

none of you americans know a thing, how would you, all of you are liberals!

liberals are perverts, so what is the point to admitting.

liberals are perverts, so what is the point to admitting.

I have pretty much proved you wrong. To my own satisfaction and to the satisfaction of people much cleverer than you are. I have given irrefutable arguments why a deductive solution for chess is impossible. I know you won't be able to refute what I wrote but neither will anyone else because what I wrote is accurate.

This means that the definitions you rely on are incorrect BECAUSE they are inapplicable. They are inapplicable due to the reasons I have given, as to why the solution looked for by the mathematics department here (such as it is ... it isn't very strong, no PhDs at all) is impossible to achieve.

Thie discussion regarding this subject is over and the best we have is tygxc's methodology with my suggestions incorporated. There's nothing else. Tough.

none of you americans know a thing, how would you, all of you are liberals!

not on your side btw.