Chess will never be solved, here's why

You must excuse me for more typos than usual. I burned my fingers, hence wasn't posting. Also busy, which is something you never heard of. Mind you, your other master cooks things. Insults people and when they complain, goes hysterical because ppl are trying to disturb him at his cooking. Must be difficult being a well-known troll about town.

Oh did you skip reading it? Aren't you the clever one then. Funny thought that you think being that way all your life's an invalid premise. It seems pretty valid to most people.

Before I log off ...
another invalid beginning by O.
Nobody 'must'. He has no authority.
Skipped the rest of that too.

Are you your own master or your own servant though? A conundrum.

It isn't a case of authority, slobberchops. It's a case of pointing out something that's true. Funny you think that YOU have authority though, and your master has authority and your friends as well! Are you getting confused again?

My wife's grandma had a cat called Gibchops.

ive always felt more slavey than mistress. not sure why. id rather be led than followed i guess. louzy in leadership me

chess has been solved by my toaster bro yall don't understand

u needta ease up on the pop tarts there

you actually claimed (twice!) that you could write a program to represent chess mathematically.

yeah. lets see what that coconut a urs is made a.

i like how deep tygxc goes...he took me somewhere w/ 12790

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4P2kzzL1LR4

He's far too ham-handed to pull off that type of subterfuge for any length of time.

'Solving' chess is such a stupid concept. Yesterday I have won a game playing against a bot. Since the game has reached an end, I therefore have 'solved' chess.

Lots of people that don't understand things label them as "stupid" in order to cope.

dio, a reminder that the guy you are responding to isnt tygxc or optimissed and you should not treat them with the same bluntness/dismissiveness.

Playerafar has already gone down that path don't do the same thing

Dismissiveness is the appropriate response to a dismissive post. You'll note that I have not been any more dismissive than the poster, since I am mirroring their own criticism back. I'm always measured in my responses.

You two are newbies here...so keep things in perspective. You will not be able to modify behaviors on either side of the aisle, especially for well established posters. Show, don't tell.

Fun fact: The ICCF does this. If a position is reached where Syzygy tablebase shows a win for White and White claims it, the game ends right then and there 1-0 and vice versa for Black.

Fun fact: running an imperfect engine and trying to bridge to a tablebase is not a proof of anything and is irrelevant to solving chess.

This facet of ICCF play is integral to Tygxc's faulty premises, so it's not news to anyone here.

just because they are dismissive in an initial post doesnt mean that they will be dismissive in the future. their dismissiveness is only based on the knowledge that they have, not necessarily based on their willingness to new information.

...and they will have an opportunity to post again and not be dismissive. No harm, no foul. They made a pointed observation, they got a pointed observation back. Learning by trial and error in action.