Chess with no increment is unplayable

Sort:
x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:

You can rage on. Chess.com will not delete 10|0. Nor should it.

 

It should, because it is not true rapid. It is blitz, and allows fake chess to be played be people seeking real chess.

If you want to play true rapid, play 15|10. Let people who want to play 10|0 do what they want.

AunTheKnight

Moves are quicker online, aren't they?

KriVysh

This is a bruh moment...

so if I simplify what this man is saying I hear "you should get your account banned for not having the same opinion as me"

Also, chess can be played however people like it although 10|5 would be a nice setting.

SlantedLight

so if I simplify what this man is saying I hear "you should get your account banned for not having the same opinion as me"

That's right.

 

If you want to play true rapid, play 15|10. Let people who want to play 10|0 do what they want.

10|3 should be added, 10|0 removed, because 10|0 allows people to shovel in their garbage fake chess into a time control (rapid) that is supposed to disallow it.

 

 

x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:

so if I simplify what this man is saying I hear "you should get your account banned for not having the same opinion as me"

That's right.

You are either a troll, or so incredibly arrogant that it's almost funny

M1m1c15
Seriously
M1m1c15
I think he’s just mad that he loses because he dies watch the time
M1m1c15
Doesn’t not dies
AunTheKnight
AntiMustard wrote:
SlantedLight wrote:

so if I simplify what this man is saying I hear "you should get your account banned for not having the same opinion as me"

That's right.

You are either a troll, or so incredibly arrogant that it's almost funny

What if both?

Piglemon

Just play faster

JamesColeman

Yeah, it’s an absolute nightmare mate, nothing worse. You should only be able to send your move to your opponent once a year in a Christmas Card (or a similarly equivalent festival of one’s choosing). This allows time for reflection and game completion; the gentlemanly way to do it. 

I for one, hope the website heeds your advice and deletes all this fake chess, and expunges all the records of the so called fake champions. Well played for standing up against this tyranny. 

AunTheKnight
JamesColeman wrote:

Yeah, it’s an absolute nightmare mate, nothing worse. You should only be able to send your move to your opponent once a year in a Christmas Card (or an similarly equivalent festival of one’s choosing). This allows time for reflection and game completion; the gentlemanly way to do it. 

I for one, hope the website heeds your advice and deletes all this fake chess, and expunges all the records of the so called fake champions. Well played for standing up against this tyranny. 

Lol

SlantedLight

I for one, hope the website heeds your advice and deletes all this fake chess, and expunges all the records of the so called fake champions. Well played for standing up against this tyranny.

I agree. An analyzer should filter out games where an opponent flagged from a lost position in rapid (blitz / bullet is acceptable), and delete their accounts. They should also, if possible, send their user information to tournament masters to ban them from playing in live events / clubs. They should also send the profiles to lawmakers to consider other forms of punishment.

x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:

10|3 should be added, 10|0 removed, because 10|0 allows people to shovel in their garbage fake chess into a time control (rapid) that is supposed to disallow it.

 

 

10|5 or 10|3 should indeed be added. 10|0 should stay. And you should get over the idea that your opinion is worth anything.

IMKeto

I think their should be more "inclusion and equality" here. 

Everyone should have the same rating.  That way no one feels bad, or gets their feeling hurt. 

Everyone should all be a GM.  That way everyone feels good all the time.

SlantedLight

That way no one feels bad

People who flag from a lost position should be made to feel bad, and to suffer.

suntian

you could just play faster 

IMKeto
SlantedLight wrote:

That way no one feels bad

People who flag from a lost position should be made to feel bad, and to suffer.

Thats not being inclusive and equal"

SlantedLight

Thats not being inclusive and equal

We're not equal, and some people lose their right to be included.

x-3232926362
suntian wrote:

you could just play faster 

You can't say that. That may suggest that OP's loss was his own fault.