Chess with no increment is unplayable

Sort:
IMKeto
SlantedLight wrote:

Thats not being inclusive and equal

We're not equal, and some people lose their right to be included.

Wrong....society now tells us that we can be whatever and whoever we want.  And that we are all equal, and if you dont agree then you are some sorta "phobic"

beesmastajoe
That was an easy block
SlantedLight

Wrong....society now tells us that we can be whatever and whoever we want. And that we are all equal, and if you dont agree then you are some sorta "phobic"

 

Fine, call me a "RapidFlagoPhobic". I'll bear that phobia proudly.

suntian
AntiMustard wrote:
suntian wrote:

you could just play faster 

You can't say that. That may suggest that OP's loss was his own fault.

ok but they shouldn't have spent 9 minutes in the first 30 moves

x-3232926362
IMBacon wrote:
SlantedLight wrote:

Thats not being inclusive and equal

We're not equal, and some people lose their right to be included.

Wrong....society now tells us that we can be whatever and whoever we want.  And that we are all equal, and if you dont agree then you are some sorta "phobic"

This thread is getting more entertaining. One troll starts a ridiculous discussion about banning time controls, and another troll tries to derail it into a political exchange with "anti-woke" provocations.

IMKeto
SlantedLight wrote:

Wrong....society now tells us that we can be whatever and whoever we want. And that we are all equal, and if you dont agree then you are some sorta "phobic"

 

Fine, call me a "RapidFlagoPhobic". I'll bear that phobia proudly.

LOL!  thumbup.png

IMKeto
AntiMustard wrote:
IMBacon wrote:
SlantedLight wrote:

Thats not being inclusive and equal

We're not equal, and some people lose their right to be included.

Wrong....society now tells us that we can be whatever and whoever we want.  And that we are all equal, and if you dont agree then you are some sorta "phobic"

This thread is getting more entertaining. One troll starts a ridiculous discussion about banning time controls, and another troll tries to derail it into a political exchange with "anti-woke" provocations.

More made up words: "anti-woke"

x-3232926362

All words are made up

blueemu
SlantedLight wrote:

I lost because my opponent threw in 12 spite checks in a lost position.

Blitz or Rapid consists of two games being played simultaneously... one on the chess-board, and one on the clock. Winning either one will win you the game.

So if your opponent had a winning advantage on the clock, then his position wasn't really "lost", was it?

You are responsible for your own time management. A chess player who complains that he only lost because he ran out of time is in the same position as a car driver who complains that he only had an accident because he was drunk.

IMKeto
blueemu wrote:
SlantedLight wrote:

I lost because my opponent threw in 12 spite checks in a lost position.

Blitz or Rapid consists of two games being played simultaneously... one on the chess-board, and one on the clock. Winning either one will win you the game.

So if your opponent had a winning advantage on the clock, then his position wasn't really "lost", was it?

You are responsible for your own time management. A chess player who complains that he only lost because he ran out of time is in the same position as a car driver who complains that he only had an accident because he was drunk.

Its the same as in rooting for your favorite sports team.  The only time their are "bad calls" is when the call goes against "your team".  If a bad call benefits your team?  "I didn't see it."

Its the same in chess.   No one has a problem with lag or the clock until they lose.

ninja888
SlantedLight wrote:

That way no one feels bad

People who flag from a lost position should be made to feel bad, and to suffer.

So all GMs should suffer now?

ConfusedGhoul

I totally agree with you, playing with no increment has very little to do with skills especially towards the endgame

Batman2508

here's a easy solution try to get some partice partners and playing "real" rapid with them..

Vizilo
SlantedLight írta:

You have a rook, bishop and 2 pawns vs king and rook and lose because it takes more than 30 seconds to convert. It's fake chess, and any time control without increment should be banned (even in casual play).

 

Disgusting: https://www.chess.com/game/live/24097107735

I like to play with increment, but the real problem was that you thought almost two and a half minutes on move 10.