chess.com summarized in 2 games

Sort:
Avatar of wanmokewan

MarioChessNiraj wrote:

How about, OP, you stop whining about losing BULLET games and play a longer time control. Jeez, you make some really immature threads mate. Instead of getting all this criticism, actually read and take our advice.

He'd rather throw temper tantrums. How the OP made it to adulthood amazes me.

Avatar of xman720

Two things:

1: Standard chess has its own rules, but in bullet you never never never resign. It's common practice in bullet. There are some exceptions (such as warzone tournaments, perhaps) but though even in blitz there is resignation, you always, always have a chance in bullet. Not just to win on time, but to take advantage of blunders your opponents makes due to time pressure. Look at your second game. You were under so much time pressure you weren't even able to mate the enemy king with two pieces, a rook, and minor pieces to spare! You are always entitled to take advantage of that kind of pressure on your opponent, especially if you have a time advantage, let alone being equally low on time.

2: Do you ever not exchange? It seems like every single opportunity you have to take a piece you take it. I didn't see a single bit of finesse in controlling the exchanges, you just took a piece whenever the option was available.

Avatar of pullin

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1150397258

 

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1150410103

Avatar of MarioChessNiraj

Like we said, don't play bullet if you can't win. Also, why did you buy membership if you're just going to complain about how bad the website is, when it is just your own fault?

Avatar of wanmokewan

*facepalm*

Avatar of GreenCastleBlock

My guess is, OP is not bothering to read any of the responses and just likes to hear himself talk.

Avatar of richb8888

Stop crying this is a great site and play corresponance or live chess then-for me blitz is not real chess

Avatar of pullin

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155869785

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155868485

When a now 1115 rating player demolishes a 1350 (& still loses on time) you know something is wrong with your website

Avatar of pullin

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155874712

 

When an 1100 beats the 1550 CPU hard in 2|1 after two games (in two try's) you know there is something wrong. 

Avatar of Kirkwood

I think if time trouble continues to be an issue for you then you should really consider playing a longer time control :)

Avatar of incantevoleutopia

Pullin, you've had your brain pulledout.

Avatar of VyboR
pullin wrote:

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155869785

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155868485

When a now 1115 rating player demolishes a 1350 (& still loses on time) you know something is wrong with your website

When a 1115 rated player loses against a 1350 and needs to find an excuse to satisfy his e-peen.

Avatar of VyboR
pullin wrote:

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1155874712

 

When an 1100 beats the 1550 CPU hard in 2|1 after two games (in two try's) you know there is something wrong. 

It has nothing to do with ratings. Chess.com's computers are notorious for their inconsistent play but especially horrendous blunders which even a 800 rated player would see.

And that game surely proves it: free queen give-away, horrible exchanges.