My rating has been as high as 2400. My USCF rating is at its all time high at 1836. I'd say the ratings are "inflated". I put the term in quote marks because ratings are never an objective measure of value, but a reflection of and predictor of results. Within the given pool that it operates, ratings can never be inflated or deflated. However, if 2200 reflects master level play, then the ratings on the tactics trainer are way too high.
Chess.com tactics trainer
Sort:
I know many of us use tactics trainer here on chess.com,Does any think that if you have a 2300 rating on the tactics trainer that it's really accurate,becasue it gives me a little more than 60% passing the tactics,40% failing which should mean that I'm playing about around 1500 or soo OTB, or are the tactics here really strong as they say they are?Any thoughts or suggestions?