chessmaster is a little more laid back. Fritz is great for game analysis.
Chessmaster or Fritz or...?

But the environment n interface of c master is much more exiting.in addition c masther has game analysis and move advice too.
Chessmaster is much simplier and easier to use, and have tons of material to learn - take the Grandmaster version, its old, sometimes buggy but still great knowledge zone for players like You and me - King engine is still above 3 000 elo - ask yourself - do you really need/ get better for such a low price ?

I am an amateur player n I like to play n practice chess on my pc coz my net is not ok.Now what pc software do you prefer my friends?Chessmaster or fritz or any other one?
I don't know if there's a simple answer to your question. Do you need good tutorials like Chessmaster has? Are you just going to play the preinstalled engines that come with the GUI, or will you want to install more engines yourself? Do you need tablebases? (It might be a bit harder to set up tablebases in Chessmaster. Also, the proprietary CM tablebases only work in gameplay mode, not in analysis mode.) Is engine strength important? (Chessmaster is probably only 2600 to 2700 range, but that might be more than adequate.)
I don't use Fritz, but many people like it. You might try the free Lucas Chess first to see if it's good enough for your needs. ( https://www-lucaschess.rhcloud.com/index.html )
I like the Chessmaster tutorials, but analyzing games with Chessmaster is a bit of a headache. It does have some natural language commentary, which is a plus. However, Chessmaster is a very dated program. Ubisoft no longer sells or supports it; You'd have to find a used copy somewhere. Compatibility with the newer operating systems is a potential issue. Also, Chessmaster can't import UCI engines like Stockfish, unless you want to get your hands dirty and use a Polyglot adapter (not recommended for the faint of heart).

need to tell u that I don know anything about engine.is there any need for an amateur player to import engine?other thing to mention is that u said c.master rating is about 2700.dont u think it is enough for an amateur player?
THANK U ALL

need to tell u that I don know anything about engine.is there any need for an amateur player to import engine?other thing to mention is that u said c.master rating is about 2700.dont u think it is enough for an amateur player?
THANK U ALL
If you're happy playing against the pre-installed engines supplied with the GUI, then no, there's no reason to install extra engines. Some people like to play against certain engines, which might not be supplied with the GUI.
For playing, 2700 elo is enough for most people. However, many people who do analysis want the strongest engines possible.
P.S. Oh, I forgot to mention one more thing. I'm not sure about CM11 (because I don't own that one), but I don't think CM10 is capable of importing 64-bit engines, either. (Only 32-bit engines, and as I mentioned before, not UCI engines.)
I am an amateur player n I like to play n practice chess on my pc coz my net is not ok.Now what pc software do you prefer my friends?Chessmaster or fritz or any other one?