I managed to reach move 55 in a drawish endgame against a player near 2000+, so I'm not a patzer.
If you lost it, maybe it was not so drawish after all ?
I could also probably reach move 55 in a 'drawish' position against Anand if such was my aim. (king vs. king+queen is drawish, right ?)
As for "rating do not measure strength, but past performance"... Hum...
So past performance is not a good indicator of strength ? What is then ?
The quality of chess is an indicator of strength, not the performance. I had a string of five losses and my ratings jumped 15 points.
I managed to reach move 55 in a drawish endgame against a player near 2000+, so I'm not a patzer.
If you lost it, maybe it was not so drawish after all ?
I could also probably reach move 55 in a 'drawish' position against Anand if such was my aim. (king vs. king+queen is drawish, right ?)
As for "rating do not measure strength, but past performance"... Hum...
So past performance is not a good indicator of strength ? What is then ?
Umm... No. It was a rather easy draw, but in fact I shoulde have won on move 48. My opponent admitted he got lucky.
And why are you so apt to use Anand in every post? Anand would crush you like a grape before move 30.