Conflicts between superadmins

Hey, in one of my clubs one superadmin demoted and kicked out an other (without preliminary dicussions). 😼

How to solve such issues?

Any constructive advice is welcome! 😎

That is why I am the only SA in my club. Other SA's have the power to kick you out. I would say just start a new club, and make sure you are the only SA

Thanks bro! 👍 I'm still an oldest superadmin in that club. But it starts to worry me.

Yea that has never happened to me but it sounds bad. How many members did your club have?

"Chess Universe", 1240 members. 😎

Ouch! Mine has 5!

https://www.chess.com/club/new-haven-bishop-brigade

pls join first 10 members get admin spots

You have to call an ultra admin, that's the only thing that can settle up battles between super admins. :P

Good idea! 👍 However, not so many really active members. 😼

Only appoint admins or super admins who need those privileges and you'll never really have this problem. Make it clear that someone abusing their power gets banned.

Hmm... I guess that nobody can kick out the owner of a club. So, U could appoint 1 additional superadmin.

Thanks for the advice! 👍 However, I don't wanna ban them, both superadmins are quite active. Well, at the moment, I demoted a superadmin, who abused his power, into a simple admin (and waiting a reply from an other who apparently quitted the club). 😼

A few facts or 'confirmations' might help.
I'm getting the impression that Yigor is the owner of the club he's talking about. Just not 100% certain.
SM are you saying its the same club that Yigor owns and that Rigelianoid did something in that club and then you did something in another?
By the way I think Rigelianoid is a 'she'.
Maybe this can all be 'mediated'.
It doesn't look hopeless.
In 'mediation' the two parties don't talk to each other they talk to the mediator and they listen to him/her.
If they both want it to be 'over' it will be but that might take very different forms.

@Yigor, maybe start a private Admin-Only group for the club to handle conflict and decisions like banning members, etc.

@StupidMonkey8, good questions! Unfortunately, too many people label others as "Nazi", "fascist", "rascist" or <insert ideology>-phobe where they don't want their worldview or suppositions challenged. Keep on asking questions!

Meanwhile, those "Ninja Monkey" messages are cool imho! 🥷

*sigh* @Rigelianoid, I'm not privy to the Ideas Room discussions, but it's not helpful to hurl those accusations at the moderator without presenting evidence - and this is not the forum to debate those issues.

btw owner doesnt mean person who created the club

while that is the case by default, the owner can transfer ownership duties to someone else (for example, if they want to quit the club)

The term 'moderator' might be being used inaccurately here.
There's opening posters of forums both in and out of clubs - there's owners and superadmins and admins of clubs - and there's 'paid chess.com staff members'.
None of those are chess.com 'moderators'.
Moderators are unpaid members of chess.com staff..A moderator could be an opening poster or an owner or a superadmin or admin - but 'moderator' doesn't refer to those things.
Yes I know the term might be used loosely.

Hi Rigel !
Well I'm thinking that 'bracket' could or should include 'owner' too.
For that particular 'bracket' I like to say 'admin team'.
I don't choose to be picky though.
Just disambiguate.  Nice word there.

Yes - and 'team member' sounds tacky.
Another idea is 'owner/SA/admin'. Or 'anybody on the admin team'.
Coordinators usually don't have any admin powers.