Confused/underpromotion

Sort:
earltony15

I'm reading about underpromotion in a book and I just don't get it.  I understand the concept but I don't understand this:  in the example, promotion to a queen led to stalemate so making the pawn a rook was suggested.  someone help me understand the difference.  anywhere a queen can go, a rook can go...thanks.

TonightOnly
A rook can go anywhere a Queen can go, but not in the same number of turns. A Queen attacks more squares than a rook because it can move diagonally as well. Therefore, a rook may avoid giving stalemate where a Queen would.
likesforests

Here's a typical position where underpromotion saves the day. Be sure to click on "Move List". If White queens his pawn he's immediately mated.

 


JediMaster
I was on another website where underpromotion to a knight resulted in checkmate.  Normally probably in 98% of cases it would be the case to promote to queen, but not always is it good to do so.
Charlie91
The diagram above answers this question.  An example of a game where underpromotion to a knight leading to checkmate is demonstrated at blog.chess.com/Charlie91/knighting-the-pawn.  In that example, queening would still lead to a win but with more moves.
ForumBumper9000

to prevent stalemate, or just super specific positions that you need to underpromote

NikkiLikeChikki
Let’s be honest: most of the time underpromotion is done because it’s funny.
blueemu

 

batgirl
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
Let’s be honest: most of the time underpromotion is done because it’s funny.

Or more elegant.