Isn't the theme of the thread chess?
No, the theme of this thread is whether timed tactics problems help beginners. I'd recommend that you make your initial post in a new thread instead of attempting to hijack this thread.
Isn't the theme of the thread chess?
No, the theme of this thread is whether timed tactics problems help beginners. I'd recommend that you make your initial post in a new thread instead of attempting to hijack this thread.
hello,
been playing for about 6 months and it seems like digging deeper into a position would be time better spent for a beginner (like ME) than quickly finding something that works? i mean, isn't that the opposite of finding the “best” move? when solving a position… shouldn’t we look deeply for the best move? quickly finding a move seems like i'am using intuition more than calculating ability? my goal is learning to solve positions in OTB games (not blitz) it feels like timed-tactic drills are leading me in the wrong direction? am i missing something? …i usually do:)
tnx 4 any ideas
I'd definitely agree with the general opinion already posted to this thread.. don't use the timer at this point. General observations:

If that's the case, then *before* trying to solve tactics problems you should concentrate on not dropping pieces! The Novice Nook articles contain some good "mental checklists" to go through before you move, which will really help here.
The "Step-by-step" method (originally from the Netherlands but now available in English too) stresses this heavily - learn to walk first (not dropping pieces) before you try to run (worry about two-move and three-move tactics)
Once you've sorted that out (or if you already have, in which case congratulations) then use tactical exercises to learn patterns *and* to practice how to think in a disciplined way. Since you play OTB, I would recommend you set up the test position on your board and try to solve it there, as if it were a real game. This will encourage you to try and think through the whole solution before moving pieces, rather than grab-and-guess which is all to tempting to do in the browser.
If you get stuck on a position and can't find the answer, put it to one side and make a note to come back to it later. Take a screenshot or whatever you find convenient. Then move onto another one. Try to resist the temptation to "give up and click for the answer". Get the friends you play with to try the problem and if they work it out, they can give you better (as in more subtle) hints than the programs can. By working the exercises into your social OTB play you will hopefully find them more of a pleasure and less of a chore.
I could go on but it would start to get off-topic (if I haven't already
)
Good luck and enjoy your chess!
Isn't the theme of the thread chess?
No, the theme of this thread is whether timed tactics problems help beginners. I'd recommend that you make your initial post in a new thread instead of attempting to hijack this thread.
How about you worry about what you say and where, and I will worry about what I say and where?
If someone wants to violate the forum rules, I can't stop him; Only a moderator can do that. (Well, the OP could block you from making further posts, but that's also not within my capabilities.) I've given you the rule, if you want to flaunt it, be my guest. It's no skin off my nose, although the OP might be irked, since it's her thread.
"tactics time" is a great book, i've played thru both volumes for a total of 2000 problems. single best thing i've done to improve my ability.
I haven't red all the previous answers so may be repeating what's already been said, but I'll voice my opinion anyway.
hello,
been playing for about 6 months and it seems like digging deeper into a position would be time better spent for a beginner (like ME) than quickly finding something that works? i mean, isn't that the opposite of finding the “best” move? when solving a position… shouldn’t we look deeply for the best move? quickly finding a move seems like i'am using intuition more than calculating ability? my goal is learning to solve positions in OTB games (not blitz) it feels like timed-tactic drills are leading me in the wrong direction? am i missing something? …i usually do:)
tnx 4 any ideas
There are at least two different skills involved in finding tactics in chess positions :
Pattern recognition doesn't rely on calculation : it's just things you already know popping up in your brain. A bit like the words you pick in your natural language : you don't have to think about them to complete a sentence like : "I'm going to school and will stay at Amanda's this [evening/week-end]"
However, calculation somewhat relies on pattern recognition (but not only), as the patterns you identify as you calculate help guide your calculations (eg. you try to make some checkmating combinations work).
Back to your question, in general it's better to spend some reasonable time trying to solve puzzles, as you need to look around to find relevant elements in the position. However, quick solving could be used to develop pattern recognition, by browsing through simple and related problems (eg. a set of back-rank mates for example). TT on chess.com is not the best tool to do this though.
Good luck with your chess. And keep your independant way of thinking, whatever you read in these forums ! 
The logic behind using a timer is that stronger players will not only solve tactics of a certain level more accurately than weaker players, but that they will also come up with the solution faster. The purpose really is so that the stronger players aren't stuck doing 100 simple puzzles when they want to be challenged. Your question is framed such that the timer, rather than the position, is the concern. Ignore the timer.
In the mean time it's kind of vital you start
Play a game, do a tactic! Make mistakes, it's fine. MOre fun too. Never mind all the wonderful books, and well meant advice. If you don't do anything, what good is it all? You have a Diamond membership. Use it!
I agree with Samaritaine that it is vital you start playing. I've played thousands of games of chess on this site and on others and I've lost most of them. It is only after having played (and lost) all of those games that I am beginning to recognize patterns and positions/see possible tactics/avoid blunders/have an idea of what my opponent will do. The fact that you mentioned your comfort zone at all tells me that you know what you must do...NOW GO GET 'EM!
What is the most complicated and interesting game you have ever played? How many moves? Can you imagine playing a game that was 1000's of moves long?
Wut?
What was I not clear about?
Everything. Your post seems to have nothing to do with the theme of the thread.