justbefair wrote:
Please post an example or two of inhuman moves.
Why would I do that when you have just as much access to the archives as I do.
Does Chess.com use Bots as Players on their live Games?
Sort:
@justbefair you have a reputation you believe is important to uphold so I'm not going to have a discussion with someone with biased views.
You cant use bots as "players" because computer programs dont play like human beings and thus many people would notice that they are actually fighting bots.
And I wished people would stop looking at this accuracy rating. As far as I can tell it says very little.
Feb 9, 2025
0
#65
DownOnePiece wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Please post an example or two of inhuman moves.
Why would I do that when you have just as much access to the archives as I do.
Because I am not you and I would like to know what you are seeing when you see a move you think would not be played by a human.
Feb 9, 2025
0
#66
Chesscom has become the protectorate of the fraud going after those who want a clean server honest games just much as the USAID HOW MICH MONEY did Chesscom receive from USAID given all they did with the Ukraine war? How much chess com did u take from taxpayers
Feb 9, 2025
0
#67
justbefair wrote:
DownOnePiece wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Please post an example or two of inhuman moves.
Why would I do that when you have just as much access to the archives as I do.
Because I am not you and I would like to know what you are seeing when you see a move you think would not be played by a human.
Dude just try to do your job and get the cheaters off thr servers how hard is it to understand that we players play against bots all day it sucks
how many more messages do you need every week there are messages about it every week the problem IS NOT SOLVED
justbefair wrote:
Because I am not you and I would like to know what you are seeing when you see a move you think would not be played by a human.
moving two pawns down the board one move after another, then move a minor piece randomly. this is more apparent when there are no other pieces on the board. besides the said pieces and Kings.
DownOnePiece wrote:
moving two pawns down the board one move after another, then move a minor piece randomly. this is more apparent when there are no other pieces on the board. besides the said pieces and Kings.
It's actually funny looking to be honest...it's like the bot is getting confused 😭
Feb 9, 2025
0
#71
DownOnePiece wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Because I am not you and I would like to know what you are seeing when you see a move you think would not be played by a human.
moving two pawns down the board one move after another, then move a minor piece randomly. this is more apparent when there are no other pieces on the board. besides the said pieces and Kings.
Yes. Humans would never do that. 😉
justbefair wrote:
Yes. Humans would never do that. 😉
Apparently you think I'm talking about just moving the pawns to promote. Don't be so sarcastic and condescending. It's the sequence of events that I'm referring to.
Feb 9, 2025
0
#73
Sarcasm and condescension from a mod alienate users, stifle open dialogue, and damage the forum’s supportive, respectful environment.
Feb 9, 2025
0
#74
DownOnePiece wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Yes. Humans would never do that. 😉
Apparently you think I'm talking about just moving the pawns to promote. Don't be so sarcastic and condescending. It's the sequence of events that I'm referring to.
You are not able to provide any actual examples...
Isn't it possible that you are mistaken?
Feb 9, 2025
0
#75
TeamPabloJorge wrote:
Chesscom has become the protectorate of the fraud going after those who want a clean server honest games just much as the USAID HOW MICH MONEY did Chesscom receive from USAID given all they did with the Ukraine war? How much chess com did u take from taxpayers
Now you are including nonsensical political posts.
Sorely tempted to lock the thread.
justbefair wrote:
You are not able to provide any actual examples...
Isn't it possible that you are mistaken?
Between here and lichess I have played well over 50,000+ games. Not including otb through the years. So what are you asking exactly? For me to comb through thousands and thousands of games just to show you something that maybe you haven't experienced yourself so it possibly couldn't be true? Consider this, instead of being a sheep, think outside the box for once. Because if it can be thought up, then more than likely someone has already done it or in the process of.
Is the topic the forum mentioned still being talked about if so btw don’t take much from me I’m a beginner yesterday my Elo went up to 261 and i has a good record yesterday but today I felt like I was losing every game and they were playing much above the rating level but again I just wanted to share
Feb 9, 2025
0
#78
DownOnePiece wrote:
justbefair wrote:
You are not able to provide any actual examples...
Isn't it possible that you are mistaken?
Between here and lichess I have played well over 50,000+ games. Not including otb through the years. So what are you asking exactly? For me to comb through thousands and thousands of games just to show you something that maybe you haven't experienced yourself so it possibly couldn't be true? Consider this, instead of being a sheep, think outside the box for once. Because if it can be thought up, then more than likely someone has already done it or in the process of.
I am not asking for50,000 examples. Just a couple of good ones.
Last three games with black I play the Alekhine defense and my opponents (diferente profiles) gambit the A4 pawn wich Is considered really not good. Im about 1300+ at the momento and the games were like after the bad oppening the supposed ai played not the best moves but seconds or so not to be lost and then go on like 20 moves until I blunder. This is concerning and if Chess.com does not adress it I will stop playing
Feb 9, 2025
0
#80
JoelTibaldo wrote:
Last three games with black I play the Alekhine defense and my opponents (diferente profiles) gambit the A4 pawn wich Is considered really not good. Im about 1300+ at the momento and the games were like after the bad oppening the supposed ai played not the best moves but seconds or so not to be lost and then go on like 20 moves until I blunder. This is concerning and if Chess.com does not adress it I will stop playing
They won't address it.
Im pretty sure they use bot as humans players. im a normal 1400 player and i played everyday. I am now 1100. Not because im too weak, i sometimes played 91% accuracy and the lowest was 59 or less on my worst. On my best at 1100 player, i battle with someone who is 88- 90% accurate most of the times with a weird names photos and etc. And at my worst, we are both below in accuracies. Means it depends how we played the game and the human bot depends on how you manage to counter those moves. You need to outplayed them on opening to midgame coz they crushed you instantly on midgames if you don't have enough skills. Im on Champion League Level.
I am very annoyed on this Chess.com strategy. Did everyone notice that searching or finding opponents are too fast, unlike Lichess. 🤔
Yes they do it
they allow it but they say they don’t