in a FIDE game (i think) you would be awarded the win but chess.com awards it as a draw for some reason
Draw although lost by time

The checkmate is theoretically possible so, I guess, it's not a draw by FIDE rules.

It doesn't matter if FORCED mate is possible. It only matters if mate is possible - even if it would require very bad play by the opponent. After all, if the player had one second left he might play very badly, so why assume he would play better with no time left?

I'm on the fence when it comes to that scenario. It's an unlikely situation when a king can mate with just a knight, especially when the enemy king is nowhere near a corner or restricted by any of his pieces or pawns, so it's most likely a draw. However I also believe if there's gonna be clocks then the faster player should win. The player that ran out of time may or may not've been making good moves, but either way it took him longer to do so.
Tough one.

All right, thanks to precise it.

Yeah, it's a tough close one, I've seen more compelling cases where a full 1 point win could be awarded.
One size doesn't fit all, so I sympathise with the programmers on this one, some situations may be best decided by an arbiter, which is way above my point grade, but that won't stop me getting my tuppence say
Factors: Time, Material, Position & Possibilities.
Time: Okay, you could give each side extra time to prove their case (this could be a tickbox option set in game challenges applying only to these draw situations (pre-agreed)).
This could be: Double any remaining time + 10% of the total time/ game, so 10% of 5 mins= 30 seconds, giving:
White 0:00 x2= 0m:00s + 30 secs= 30 seconds.
Black 0:02.3 x2= 0m:04.6 secs + 30 secs= 34.6 seconds.
You both could play each other with this & let us know how you got on (I'm certain that it would be a draw).
iProCheckmateKing wrote:
Chess.com uses the US Chess (formerly USCF) rule about draws in this type of situation.
The game is a draw unless the player who did not run out of time has a forced checkmate.
Yes, I agree, that's better than a draw & I'm glad this is implemented, however, the extra time (seamless & instantaneous) would be good for players to prove it by playing it!, winning by any mate

@danandsid Yes, in this scenario a Draw is correct, but with the same material in a different position a win is possible by forced mate, I just think that players should prove it by playing it, surely anybody would want to be able to see any checkmate/ win/ victory.
Maybe they'll play 5 mins + 1 sec/ move in future
Not FIDE rules. There is no break in the system, this topic has been raised before.
Hey all together,
I just played a game. I had only one knight and my king and my opponent had the a- pawn and d-pawn. Time ran out for my opponent and the game was drawned.
Now I have the question: Why?
I am still able to make check mate by pushing the opponent king in the corner in front of its pawn. Then I only have to bring my king near and give check with the knight.
Thank you for answers!