Einstein, Buddha, and Elon Musk on Chess as a Waste of Time

Sort:
Avatar of Ziryab
long_quach wrote:
long_quach wrote:
long_quach wrote:
long_quach wrote:

What is the model for AI?

Let me explain the question to you.

What is the task that AI will take on to demonstrate its effectiveness?

Missile Command

Real Missile Command

Atari means "check" in the game of Go.

Nintendo was a playing cards manufacturer, Black Jack and stuff. That is their origin. That is their genetic origin.

Games. Simple games. Ancient games.

“Game over, man.”

Avatar of IshanGangane14
I am leaving
Avatar of BigChessplayer665

Long_quach I'm a yapper to I like arguing to but you lost just as soon as you called someone stupid:/

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

it is not that they were made of vaccume tools it's about how ai work you need calculations you know what computers are good at calculating infinity(that's there original function when they invented something called calculators in fact that was the first design of the calculator that's why chess is a good model learning+calculating (what you need for chess) the two things ai is good it

Avatar of Java
WondersOfTheCosmos wrote:

Why are you telling us this? This has no connection and you just keep on diverting the main topic of discussion for no reason.

exactly

Avatar of VerifiedChessYarshe
long_quach wrote:
WondersOfTheCosmos wrote:

Why are you telling us this? This has no connection and you just keep on diverting the main topic of discussion for no reason.

Chess was the model for computers since computers were made out of vacuum tubes. Not even transistors, as in transistor radios.

Vacuum tubes > transistors > microchips (microscopic chips).

Forget about the beginning of AI, no one really thought it would be an investment worth millions to billion of dollars at the time. Chess has nothing to do with AI. It is the truth. forget about the comic's images it has characters that ain't even real.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

He's just diverting the main topic so he can win ...

Avatar of VerifiedChessYarshe

I have experience on arguing with this stubborn guy.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

I have experience with arguing with a Russian ... They are tough cookies to crack

Avatar of VerifiedChessYarshe

@Long_Quach I have so much to say about your ridicule. You are bringing stuffs that are from fake and not trustworthy source and managed to be the most annoying spammer in this forum. I feel ironic to see this, this guy deserves a longer mute and thats the only way to end the forum's heat.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

@verifiedchessyarshe is half correct that chess has nothing to do with ai it isn't the same as running a airplane simulation but the reason ai is so good at chess is 1.calcuating is their main function 2.ai can learn

Which is the two things you need for chess you can argue the history of why ai is good at chess but that is its function it is good st chess because calculating is ais main job(other than writing fake messages)

Avatar of VerifiedChessYarshe

I can agree

Avatar of Optimissed

Apart from the fact that computers were invented in Britain, that comic is perfect.

Avatar of Ziryab
WondersOfTheCosmos wrote:

I hate to say this, but no one cares.

This thread began with utter nonsense. @long_quach made it interesting.

Avatar of Ziryab
Optimissed wrote:

Apart from the fact that computers were invented in Britain, that comic is perfect.

Avatar of Optimissed

That's a load of babbage though.

Avatar of Optimissed
Ziryab wrote:

I lose my hair watching beginners play. Check, check, check, … never checkmate.

White mates in five moves.

I don't think much of it, seeing as it gave Qg3 ++ as incorrect.

Avatar of Optimissed
Ziryab wrote:

I lose my hair watching beginners play. Check, check, check, … never checkmate.

White mates in five moves.

It doesn't like Qh5 ++ either.

Avatar of continuedkrombopulos22

Just know that this doesn't only apply to chess, it also applies to video games and everything else that makes you waste time.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665

What's a waste of time to one person is not a waste of time to another. It's a personal preference