Einstein called chess a waste of time, what do you think?

Sort:
TheBestBeer_Root

😆

Sensei_Joel2013
gingerninja2003 wrote:

50% of Einstein quotes are made up. 

that is very true, and i think all the memes are made up too

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

He's his own sockpuppet and he doesn't know it,
Too much to say and really should stow it.
Must give it over in case he should blow it
And then the whole World is going to know it.

Is this a display of your intellect? wink.png

Speaking of things that rhyme with "know", my father went to Stowe.

Goth123

Chess.com is not a free speech site. Go to gab.com for free speech. Get the facts on Einstein for one thing.

TheBestBeer_Root
JoelGM2013 wrote:
gingerninja2003 wrote:

50% of Einstein quotes are made up. 

that is very true, and i think all the memes are made up too

more like 85%

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

It's absoluely true that btickler's Covid thread was the officially designated one here ... probably because they knew he would not tolerate free speech. Any opinion that went contra was criticised and if the poster defended it, they were personally attacked and then blocked, when they stood up for themselves. I saw it happen to a large number of people, after which I was nearly the only critical person left alive. It was only fair on those who had been blocked for me to criticise it too, to stand up for them, in a manner of speaking. No semblance of free speech and that may have helped to do a lot of harm in the world.

And American scientists have indeed lost their jobs for disagreeing with the Big Bang. And  these days, getting the real information on Einstein is much more difficult than it was 15 years ago, because of the massive white-washing campaign.

And the word is "stow it". And the town is Stow.  There's a Wold of difference.

Your narratives, where you are always the savior somehow, are amusing at best...delusional at worst.

The people blocked from the Covid thread did not follow the guidelines.  They trolled, they posted misinformation, they attacked other posters, and they were blocked.  End of story.  It's not Shakespeare. 

P.S. Your stow attempt is laughable.  If that's your best rejoinder attempt, don't bother.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

The guidelines were only that they were not allowed to differ in opinion from you. People can be as thick as two short planks but if they agree with you, the're good posters and much to be commended. And trolling is, quite simply, disagreement with your opinions: just as I'm trolling now. It has always been that way.

You would be a far happier bunny if you stopped allowing every little thing to make you angry. OK so I'm delusional, everyone is delusional. You're not delusional at all. It's important for us, your subjects, to know that.

The entire thread stands as a testament to how delusional your narrative is.  Feel free, as always, to actually post any examples of your reality, an I will be happy to point out where you went into la-la land happy.png.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

P.S. I liked my little poem, because it scanned well and made the point that was intended. The "stow" comment was an example of English humour. Subtle, clever, corny and clearly not for you.

Why DID you make reference to Stowe School? Boasting that your father went to a public school? Not like you .... thought you're an egalitarian.

Someone logical might have decided it was establishing common ground.

You humor is neither subtle, or clever.  I say this with a decade of seeing it in action.

P.S. Poems with perfect rhyme kind of suck, no offense.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

Good of you to make my point, sir. Ladedaland is any land where the subjects disagree with the opinions of the Master. How else could it be? We, your subjects, may be almost unanimous and therefore we will unanimously inhabit Ladedaland. You're magnificently eloquent, O Great One.

Overreaching, to a cringeworthy degree.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:


Beano Superstars - Cuthbert Cringeworthy | Character Profile
https://www.beano.com › posts › beano-superstars-cuth...
 
 
 
11 May 2022 — Name: Cuthbert Cringeworthy ; Age: 9 ; Best friend: Teacher ; Worst enemy: Anyone who's misbehaving or not listening, or just making Teacher's life ...

Don't use the Wiki entry for this. Complely wrong. Thinks Cuthbert's character was introduced in 1972, not 1956. 

What's next, a Babar reference?  Seriously.  Overreaching.  Let it go.

dfgh123
Goth123 wrote:

Chess.com is not a free speech site. Go to gab.com for free speech. Get the facts on Einstein for one thing.

I think you're just mad chess.com don't allow hate speech, interesting that we have similar names and we joined in the same month and year.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

I don't even know what over-reaching is. Doing something you disapprove of?

But I can see how much you're enjoying yourself, since you're winning every point you make. Why should you want me to stop setting you up for yet another win? You're doing so well that you ought to be enjoying it.

I see.  So I am enjoying it, but you wrote the bad poem, and tossed out all the corny dialogue. 

Overreaching is when a poster cannot back up the the claims they made, and turns to obsequious humor and flimsy strawmen to try and deflect their imagined audience away from that fact.

There's not much enjoyment, because there's not much challenge.  This is more of a public service I provide, free of charge..."don't grow up to become this guy", "don't make fun of your wife online", "don't habitually reject expertise and authority just because", etc.

MorningGlory84
btickler wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

I don't even know what over-reaching is. Doing something you disapprove of?

But I can see how much you're enjoying yourself, since you're winning every point you make. Why should you want me to stop setting you up for yet another win? You're doing so well that you ought to be enjoying it.

I see.  So I am enjoying it, but you wrote the bad poem, and tossed out all the corny dialogue. 

Overreaching is when a poster cannot back up the the claims they made, and turns to obsequious humor and flimsy strawmen to try and deflect their imagined audience away from that fact.

There's not much enjoyment, because there's not much challenge.  This is more of a public service I provide, free of charge..."don't grow up to become this guy", "don't make fun of your wife online", "don't habitually reject expertise and authority just because", etc.

I would add "don't reach late middle age and your only support network/social outlet be internet forums".

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

I think I may turn my hand to writing a best selling, psychological novel, which will be useful as a psychology standard text, when I'm perhaps 75 and want a less physical life. I would defer it until I'm 80 but I want more than 25 years in which to enjoy the proceeds, drive fast cars, pull 25 year olds etc. I always intended to be a best selling author but became more interested in other things. There's only so much one person can do and I've done a fair bit of it already.

As for not growing up to become bticklish, that's self-evident but forunately, he's put so much effort into personally demonstrating the terrible things which can befall us, through his own examples, that he's already performed a great service to mankind, alhough he doesn't know it.

I'm sure everyone will be eagerly awaiting your best selling novel.  Most people are just too timid, and simply satisfied to write a novel, period, and then see what comes.  It's also admirable that your very first foray is going to become a definitive textbook...well done.  Maybe your wife can be your publicist, and handle the 25 year old groupies for you.  That would certainly be a load off your mind...

*backs away slowly*

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

I was finding our game rather dull. I have some stamps I need to put in a stock book, which will be more interesting. Goodnight.

Sure, that's why you came back 35 minutes later, to add a one line post telling us all how bored you are wink.png.

witty_cupcake
NervesofButter wrote:

Its amazing how so many posts can be made and so little is said in 24 hours.

Maybe that's why we're all here, NOB  hahahahahahappytonguehappy

calbitt5750
Einstein was the greatest theoretical physicist so far, which didn’t qualify him as an expert on chess or wasting time.
DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

Matter of opinion. I think Maxwell was FAR greater than Einstein. It's just that Einstein died in the 50s and many of us can remember him dying. He based his work on that of Maxwell, without crediting Maxwell.

That's a load of BS wink.png.

https://www.cantorsparadise.com/the-wall-of-albert-einsteins-home-bears-the-portrait-of-three-eminent-scientists-f84d0c458dce

On Einstein:
He once said I owe more to Maxwell than to anyone. Because there would be no modern physics without Maxwell’s electromagnetic field equations. On his 100th birthday, Einstein appreciated his work as the “most profound and the most fruitful that physics has experienced since the time of Newton.” When Einstein was asked if he stood on the shoulders of Newton, he replied: “No, on the shoulders of Maxwell.”

[and]

The person whose name is synonymized nowadays with the word ‘genius’ had his scientific masters too. Few of them include Newton, Maxwell, Mach, Planck, Faraday, and Lorentz. He, without any hesitation, regarded Lorentz as one of the most powerful thinkers. He acknowledged him in words that he would never have been able to discover the special theory of relativity without his prior contributions. On one of his bookshelves, he had a small leather framed portrait of Professor H. A. Lorentz.

Albert Einstein kept a picture of English scientist Michael Faraday on his study wall, alongside pictures of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell at his apartment in Berlin, Germany. He once quoted “England has always produced the best physicists”. He expressed his warmth in an essay written for the centenary of Maxwell’s birth [1931] as, “The greatest change in the axiomatic basis of physics, and correspondingly in our conception of the structure of reality, since the foundation of theoretical physics through Newton, came about through the researches of Faraday and Maxwell on electromagnetic phenomena.”

Elroch

Einstein's natural inclination was to find a classical theory of everything resembling Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, and he is reported to have continued working on this late in life. The problem was that quantum mechanics provided an unsurmountable barrier to this!

MorningGlory84
Elroch wrote:

Einstein's natural inclination was to find a classical theory of everything resembling Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, and he is reported to have continued working on this late in life. The problem was that quantum mechanics provided an unsurmountable barrier to this!

Correct, although he made a huge contribution to quantum mechanics nonetheless, even if he struggled to accept some of its premises. Darwin never fully accepted humans were part of the animal kingdom with its incumbent implications either. Scientists are not removed from their cultural backdrops.