genius
ERROR report
Sort:
Dec 26, 2022
0
#5
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY
Lol
"This prepares your bishop for development"
Dec 26, 2022
0
#7
eric0022 wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY
Lol
"This prepares your bishop for development"
haha
Dec 26, 2022
0
#8
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
but isn't this a wrong move ?)))
colorfulcake wrote:
genius
Now I know why White can get a game rating of 2723 but I can't. Mystery unlocked!
I wonder if the analysis would be similar for other users.
If other users analyse the situation using a review and similar "100% accuracy" or a "2723 rating for White" results still occur, it's going to be really weird.
Dec 26, 2022
0
#12
eric0022 wrote:
I wonder if the analysis would be similar for other users.
If other users analyse the situation using a review and similar "100% accuracy" or a "2723 rating for White" results still occur, it's going to be really weird.
yeah,that's true
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY
If my understanding is correct, book moves are the moves that follow a certain opening stored in Chess.com's database until theory begins, or a poor or suboptimal move is played. Since the position that you displayed has been popularized and is widely known as the fastest possible checkmate, and has been named the Fool's mate, Chess.com has added it to their opening database (like the Bongcloud).
Mango314 wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY
If my understanding is correct, book moves are the moves that follow a certain opening stored in Chess.com's database until theory begins, or a poor or suboptimal move is played. Since the position that you displayed has been popularized and is widely known as the fastest possible checkmate, and has been named the Fool's mate, Chess.com has added it to their opening database (like the Bongcloud).
I wonder if all the seven/eight half-moves in the four-move Scholars' mate would be classified as "book moves" based on this.
Dec 26, 2022
0
#15
Mango314 wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY
If my understanding is correct, book moves are the moves that follow a certain opening stored in Chess.com's database until theory begins, or a poor or suboptimal move is played. Since the position that you displayed has been popularized and is widely known as the fastest possible checkmate, and has been named the Fool's mate, Chess.com has added it to their opening database (like the Bongcloud).
ok,i know it's a bookmove now but why it is 100 accuracy,althought it's a bookmove but it's a bad move
Dec 26, 2022
0
#16
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
but isn't this a wrong move ?)))
Sure looks like a wrong move, but who could argue with a 2723 performance!?
Dec 26, 2022
0
#17
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
but isn't this a wrong move ?)))
Sure looks like a wrong move, but who could argue with a 2723 performance!?
but white was checkmated in few moves and he got 2723?
Dec 26, 2022
0
#18
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
but isn't this a wrong move ?)))
Sure looks like a wrong move, but who could argue with a 2723 performance!?
but white was checkmated in few moves and he got 2723?
Appears to be the situation. But black could have prevented this. The true refutation is 1.e6!!
And that, my friends, is how to think like a 2800, and make your opposition 1100 points weaker!
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
Strawberry_Pomelo wrote:
Mayo_Neighs wrote:
I've heard that back in the day, learning chess took lots of hard work and focus. Nowadays, due to technology, anyone can play at a 2700 level in just a few moves!
but isn't this a wrong move ?)))
Sure looks like a wrong move, but who could argue with a 2723 performance!?
but white was checkmated in few moves and he got 2723?
Appears to be the situation. But black could have prevented this. The true refutation is 1.e6!!
And that, my friends, is how to think like a 2800, and make your opposition 1100 points weaker!
The numbers might even be lower if 1. f3 and 2.g4 are reversed.
Why are these four steps all bookmove? Isn't g4 the wrong move lead to lose? The result is that the analysis panel both got 100 points IN ACCURACY