Every fool can win in blitz chess !

Can every fool win in blitz chess ? :))

It's not that I'm bad at blitz, no no no, it's that blitz itself is bad. I'm actually good.

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=105353002

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=105597144

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=107958592

Take a look on this beatifull NORMAL chess games by me xD. Note : I was low rated because I withdrew from couple of tornaments and automatically resigned many games But my rating goes up again :)

aaaaand thats why I like to play itt ! VvvvV

lol, before I clicked on these I thought you were being sarcastic and were posting really sloppy blitz games to prove your point that blitz is not real chess.

But I looked at them and thought, those are decent blitz games.

But I just now noticed they're correspondence

Blitz helps practice openings, and understand the middlegame positions better. Because face it. Nobody is going to play 500 long OTB games before deciding they dont like an opening.

Do you guys usually analyze your games or are you playing so many there's no time?  

It's good for openings (as long as people don't keep playing stupid crap against you!) but I'd say it's the opposite for middlegames.

In blitz I usually consciously error on the side of safety or speculation for the sake of the clock. After a single tournament game I usually feel like I've gotten more valuable experience than 100 blitz games as far as the middlegame.

Well, I don't want to win a blitz game, or as the heading states, "I'd be a fool".  (:-)

Blitz is real chess as standard, it's meant to test speed and accuracy. If I may ask you, why is examination timed even when examination is about thinking. It's also test speed and accuracy. If you are bad at blitz accept it and improve yourself.

i think that blitz and bullet are quite good.in bullet,u often make incorrect sacrifices and take risks even if there is no clear win.this will help u do the same in FIDE tourneys.before i didnt have the guts to try out some sacrifices in important tourneys even though i get a good attack.(even if there is a forced win).but now i have no fear in such things

Blitz and bullet is the only real chess on the internet.

Maybe he sucks, but all his ratings are yours +300 or more

I like blitz (as long as there is some form of increment, usually 2 seconds) so if an opponent decides to run their clock rather than resigning, they don't waste too much of my time. Having said that, I am significantly worse at blitz than I am at longer time controls.

So what?

Have you ever heard the saying "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"

Or "Empty vessels make the most sound"

You are busy telling everybody in the world that you are better than other players who have considerably higher ratings than you. Just like the fat drunks who like to tell the coach how much more they know about football than he does

I don't take Standard chess seriously on the internet, therefore my rating will not be as telling as the others.