With_every_step wrote:
This thread is strange.
Is it ? I find it very informative.
Extremely talented player I came across. Simply superb.
Sort:
Boogalicious wrote:
Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed the games.
Thank you very much Sir for appreciating. But you missed the point.... Let us analyse it. Who knows we might be analysing GM's game.
[COMMENT DELETED]
in_prasad wrote:
Boogalicious wrote:
Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed the games.
Thank you very much Sir for appreciating. But you missed the point.... Let us analyse it. Who knows we might be analysing GM's game.
Really sure neither player is a master. I'm not sure what you find so impressive about the games or why you are calling him 'extremely talented'.
That is no GM game. You dropped a knight.
The next one is pretty funny.
Another back rank mate. You must not consume so much alcohol while playing, Sir.
It doesn't need talent to win someone who's continuously blundering fat wood, methinks.
in_prasad wrote:
Hi All,
I am playing on chess.com since many years. I hardly come across players who can beat me in merely 10-15 moves
You're in for a real shock. Players good enough to see mate in 1 and see simple tactics when you make them available can be found everywhere.
Aug 16, 2014
0
#10
I kinda like the Panov though, even though the OP blundered once, it wasn't sooo bad methinks.
pfren wrote:
It doesn't need talent to win someone who's continuously blundering fat wood, methinks.
I lol'd
Super GM? Do you know what are you talking about? Seriously!
You're calling a just above average player extremely talented and superb! (No offense or pun intended)
I agree with quote no 8 (notmtwain ) , quote no 9 ( pfren),quote no 10 ( shell knight ) and no 13 ( Muhammad) and especially no 14 ( Muhammad again)... You are making mistakes and so your opponent is winning...
Dumb people take some time to understand sarcastic and double meaning post. Oh god forgive them. Hv any of you seen Shutter Island movie. BTW I totally agree with post #6. Ishan I can not blame any one using PC or engine cause I did same 2 days back and moderator warned me to stop naming and blaming players. Hope I made my point cleae to all readers to undetstand.
Good games.
Sac4win wrote:
please cross check with engine suggested moves lol
Good games.
Aug 16, 2014
0
#18
in_prasad wrote:
Dumb people take some time to understand sarcastic and double meaning post.
Sarcasm does not translate well between languages or over the internet.
You could always use pseudo-code to make the point clear:
[sarcasm] Sarcastic remarks go here. [/sarcasm]
blueemu wrote:
thts y i posted abovesg u dumb !!!
in_prasad wrote:
Dumb people take some time to understand sarcastic and double meaning post.
Sarcasm does not translate well between languages or over the internet.
You could always use pseudo-code to make the point clear:
[sarcasm] Sarcastic remarks go here. [/sarcasm]
in_prasad wrote:
in_prasad wrote: blueemu wrote:in_prasad wrote: Dumb people take some time to understand sarcastic and double meaning post.Sarcasm does not translate well between languages or over the internet.You could always use pseudo-code to make the point clear:[sarcasm] Sarcastic remarks go here. [/sarcasm]thts y i posted above msg u dumb !!!
blueemu wrote:
thts y i posted abovesg u dumb !!!
in_prasad wrote:
Dumb people take some time to understand sarcastic and double meaning post.
Sarcasm does not translate well between languages or over the internet.
You could always use pseudo-code to make the point clear:
[sarcasm] Sarcastic remarks go here. [/sarcasm]
Hi All,
I am playing on chess.com since many years. I hardly come across players who can beat me in merely 10-15 moves that too consecutevely with ease like Super GM. It is my immense pleasure to share these games for all of us to analyse their moves and learn. Hope this will be educating for all of us.
Kindly share your valuable thoughts to improve our game.
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=888513673
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=888512493
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=888511321