First Human To ACTUALLY Beat Stockfish?

So I was just playing against Stockfish (3200 ELO) on Chess.com, knowing that I was going to get absolutely demolished against it. I managed to beat it somehow, although it's known that many of the top players can't even beat it. I reviewed the game and it made a couple of blunders and I was stumped. Please analyze this game: 

No doubt about it, you're ready take on Magnus in the world championship...

I really don't believe I could beat him, considering that I'm only at a rating of 607.

I think that was sarcasm..

I ve analyzed the game, and i think it s just a bug, i mean the stockfish that analyzed the game is the same one you played with and yet in the analyses stockfish made mistakes,which is non sense

your opponent, komodo25, appears to have played at a sub-1000 level. 

At least I now know that it was most likely a bug, but do you guys think I played well against it?

well, you took his stuff, so i'd say yeah 

What can I do to improve at chess? Considering you're a 2000-rated player.

Yes,  most likely a bug. Stockfish plays like with 99 accuracy 

I was looking at games that stockfish (Komodo25) played against other people, and it seems that several people have beat it, even when Stockfish had like 99% accuracy. Is this already known around the chess community?

If you were playing against Stockfish, why is it called Komodo25? 

That's just the code name for Stockfish I believe. When I loaded the PGN it just said Komodo25, if you're that concerned then look it up.

Maybe it's not Stockfish, but then again, I'm relatively new to chess.

You are a god

That's not stockfish, it's Komodo ( a sort of modified version)

 And even though it's Komodo, I'm pretty sure the bot was experiencing a little downtime considering it just let the queen go like that

andrew can beat the fish

I think you might have cheated

No offense

But good job!