23113 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Is it ok to use a comp to analyze or opening books references in these types of online correspondence chess.
Only books. Nothing else. No computer, no friends, nothing. Only books!!
books and databases
no engines. no assistance from friends/coaches/others. everything else is permitted.
Here's the relevant points from the official rules (available here):
Yes. That too! :-)
THIS database isn't allowed. Am I right?
Even though it includes engine evaluations, the organization is that of a database, it isn't actually doing any calculating live, so it should be okay.
Only endgame databases are prohibited, because they show computer-verified best play.
I don't think, it makes a difference whether the engine evaluation is done "live" or not. It's help with a computer evaluation, and that's definitely not good.
THIS DB isn't allowed (or shouldn't be in case chess.com hasn't prohibited it): Nalimov Endgame Tables have solved ALL endgames with 6 or less pieces (note: pawns and Kings are counted as "pieces" too) Other clubs have banned them from CC or online use in games.
As far as the "other" DB goes I don't understand what the BFD about "engine" evaluations is, all books are allowed and BCO, MCO, ECO, NCO, opening manuals etc all have "human" evaluations which are superior to engine evaluations IMHO and where does everybody who worships engine evaluations think they came from? The engines? No, the engines are making evaluations based on whatever was programmed into them - by old-fashioned carbon-based chess engines relying on primitive neurons and synapses instead of CPUs and RAM.
"Nakamura vs Vachier-Lagrave: GM Blitz Battle Chess"
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by CorporateShill 3 minutes ago
Tired of sandbagging players
by weakatbullet 6 minutes ago
Does anyone have more concurrent games than I do?
by angelor 9 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by RALRAL3333 10 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by RALRAL3333 13 minutes ago
Who's your favorite chess player and why ?
by ModestAndPolite 13 minutes ago
how do you beat tactics puzzles
by ChessOfPlayer 15 minutes ago
OTB – Edinburgh 2016 Congress 8-10th April
by robbie_1969 17 minutes ago
Any Statistics On What Openings Win the Most and Which Are Most Popular?
by Rob3rtJamesFischer 18 minutes ago
What's your Chess.com setup? Here's mine!
by echosa 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!