Game Reviews = Terrible

Sort:
magipi
wrote:
Man, I don’t have an example. A human can probably see what I was setting up if they see the end result.

Here is an example, your last won game:

https://www.chess.com/game/live/137991375808?username=mightbdrunkorstoned

In the game, you are fixated on your "plan" to mate on f7, but that has almost no chance of working as black has a pawn on e6. When you played 6. Bc4, that doesn't threaten anything. More importantly, that 6. Bc4 is a blunder: you could have won a piece instead with 6. Bxa6 Bxa6 7. Qxc6+.

The next move black plays 7. - Nb4, threatening to play Nc2+ and win your rook. You completely ignore that to play a random move. An opponent with a brain would have simply won your rook and you lose. But of course this opponent didn't.

Another move later, black miraculously moves his e6 pawn, allowing Qxf7 mate. The engine certainly didn't expect that.

You only won that game because your opponent played random moves without thinking. Higher rated players won't be doing that. If you want to improve, you need to pay attention to what your opponent doing, instead of following your own plan that shouldn't work.

MightBDrunkorStoned
Check out this #chess game: vygaychohaha vs MightBDrunkorStoned - https://www.chess.com/game/138011665322
MightBDrunkorStoned
That one is in real time. Just happened one minute ago.
MightBDrunkorStoned
I appreciate you typing all that out, but I don’t understand chess like that, so I need it dumbed down a bit to even have a clue. I will try to figure it out after I read it again. I understand your synopsis at the end.
magipi
wrote:
Check out this #chess game: vygaychohaha vs MightBDrunkorStoned - https://www.chess.com/game/138011665322

When you played g5, white could simply take it with the c1 bishop.

Again, you are throwing away material for no good reason.

MightBDrunkorStoned
Why would I ever take a defensive stance? I want to attack. My rating is low, don’t get me wrong. I lose focus and hit wrong buttons a lot. I make really bad moves sometimes because I don’t think, so I am not trying to say I am amazing or anything. I honestly just want to play the same high ranked person 1000 times in a row and see what happens.
MightBDrunkorStoned
I am trying to bait my opponent to get a square to open up. I like my chances.
magipi
wrote:
I appreciate you typing all that out, but I don’t understand chess like that, so I need it dumbed down a bit to even have a clue. I will try to figure it out after I read it again. I understand your synopsis at the end.

Don't just read it. Click on the link and follow the game move by move.

MightBDrunkorStoned
I do agree that I am preying on bad opponents and my rating does not reflect how good I actually am. I rarely spend any time above 300.
MightBDrunkorStoned
How can I do this one on device? My opponents are dummies. That’s all I need to know right now I guess. Better players, if I ever play them, won’t fall into my traps. You’ll see!
magipi
wrote:
Why would I ever take a defensive stance? I want to attack. My rating is low, don’t get me wrong. I lose focus and hit wrong buttons a lot. I make really bad moves sometimes because I don’t think, so I am not trying to say I am amazing or anything. I honestly just want to play the same high ranked person 1000 times in a row and see what happens.

Any high rated person would just take all the pieces you throw away and win every game. Not only you'd lose 0-100 in a 100 game match, but also none of the games would be competitive.

HangingPiecesChomper
wrote:
wrote:
Why would I ever take a defensive stance? I want to attack. My rating is low, don’t get me wrong. I lose focus and hit wrong buttons a lot. I make really bad moves sometimes because I don’t think, so I am not trying to say I am amazing or anything. I honestly just want to play the same high ranked person 1000 times in a row and see what happens.

Any high rated person would just take all the pieces you throw away and win every game. Not only you'd lose 0-100 in a 100 game match, but also none of the games would be competitive.

are you saying i could beat him by chomping on hanging pieces? i thought you couldn't win games by chomping on hanging pieces.

magipi
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Why would I ever take a defensive stance? I want to attack. My rating is low, don’t get me wrong. I lose focus and hit wrong buttons a lot. I make really bad moves sometimes because I don’t think, so I am not trying to say I am amazing or anything. I honestly just want to play the same high ranked person 1000 times in a row and see what happens.

Any high rated person would just take all the pieces you throw away and win every game. Not only you'd lose 0-100 in a 100 game match, but also none of the games would be competitive.

are you saying i could beat him by chomping on hanging pieces? i thought you couldn't win games by chomping on hanging pieces.

You can beat most players by the method. No one has ever disputed that.

Guess what ? People are calling you a troll because you abuse and mock low rated players and abuse and mock chess.com. Not because of that particular piece of advice.

chessed103

maybe you are too drunk or stoned to understand why your moves are bad. you are like 250 rated. u can make random moves and win games at your rating. it doesnt mean they were good moves. if u want to get better then look at the revies and try to understand why your moves were so bad. if u dont want to get better then just do ur drugs and stay at your current rating. there is no point to this game so whichever suites you is the right answer for you, but the engine is extremely helpful and always correct if u want to understand why your check mate setup moves are bad. they will absolutely not work against higher rated opponents, but you have to decide if thats a problem for you or not.

MightBDrunkorStoned
Technically you guys are the ones hating on low rated players.
MightBDrunkorStoned
How did you go that whole time with lower case letters? You had to do that on purpose.