Get Free Coaching

Sort:
Avatar of Danielv16

Well, let's see who wins in the chess table. I'd love to see it! :)

Avatar of VLaurenT

Let's show ID and real- life rating. If you're indeed master-strength OTB, I'll gladly admit my mistake. You'll excuse me if I decline an online match against your Fritz :-)

Avatar of macer75
bangalore2 wrote:

hicetnunc is an active cheater-hunter, meaning he probably has statisical evidence to his cause.

The key word here is "probably."

Avatar of cachopan07
bangalore2 escribió:

hicetnunc is an active cheater-hunter, meaning he probably has statisical evidence to his cause.

Well i haven´t read any statistical evidence to his cause. And we can´t hold that what he says is the truth just based solely on his supposed authority (which i don´t question), because it´s a false argument by itself, false in it´s form... isn´t it?

I´m just trying to say that Sexy-sunshine knows a lot more chess than i do, and me and lot of people here would be much happier just playing and commentating games with her.

I mean, does she do any harm at all?

Avatar of bangalore2

Well, it could be argued that she harms the moral integrity of the site...

"I´m just trying to say that Sexy-sunshine knows a lot more chess than i do,"

You cannot be sure of that,as hicetnunc argues.


Avatar of macer75
bangalore2 wrote:

Well, it could be argued that she harms the moral integrity of the site...

Then why not show us how you make that argument?

Avatar of cachopan07
bangalore2 escribió:

Well, it could be argued that she harms the moral integrity of the site...

"I´m just trying to say that Sexy-sunshine knows a lot more chess than i do,"

You cannot be sure of that,as hicetnunc argues.


Man, i understand what you trying to tell us and i do believe you have your reassons to think that way, but;

First, i firmly believe in the presumption of innocence instead of a principle of culpability. I mean... who could disagree? it´s one of the Human Rights. Think it this way: "maybe acussing someone without enough proof isn´t moral either"

Second, i´m pretty sure she knows more chess than me, based on the commentary on page 2.

I don´t know, all of this resembles me a little bit to a XVI century witch-hunt process...

Avatar of RookCauldron

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=991143967 Sexy-sunshine, can you analyze this game for me, please?

Avatar of leiph15


You make it obvious you're nowhere close to master with these moves and comments. The piece placement Nf3, Bd3, Nd5, Bf4 is inconsistent and I'd even call it passive.  (Yet you say black is nearly lost!)

Bd3 and Nd5 don't fit with your stated goal of playing with the strong d5 squares (as both moves make the square weaker). Bf4 is inconsistent (you've already blocked the d file twice, so the bishop adds no pressure).

What the placement indicates to me (well, what I'd be thinking of anyway) is some kingside pressure. But Nf3 is blocking the f pawn, so you'd want to have played Bd3 then Nge2.

Also I happen to know the book move is 4.e4 and that after 4.dxe black is fine after 4...fxe, not to play d5 right away, but just go with d6 and develop. I'm not good enough to evaluate those moves on my own, I just happen to have seen games with these structures. I would expect a master to at least comment on these ideas.

I'd guess you're around 1600 (although I admit very hard to tell from just 1 game) Not that any of this is bad. My games are full of mistakes too... the difference being I don't tell people I'm a master and offer coaching.

As I said before, at least it's free.

Avatar of ConnorMacleod_151

What happened to my 960 game Sexy?

Avatar of Boogalicious

The coaching aspect is a joke. No follow-up whatsoever. If all you are prepared to do is analyze games, then please express that intent solely. Coaching requires structure and dedication; not smoke and mirrors.

Avatar of ConnorMacleod_151

I don't see any 'smoke and mirrors'.

I hope to be over 2000+ on here with the help given.

In 7 years of trying i have never reached 2000+ ...

end game lets me down.

Avatar of Boogalicious
ConnorMacleod_151 wrote:

I don't see any 'smoke and mirrors'.

Seriously?! Undecided

Avatar of GooseberryFiddich
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of ConnorMacleod_151

It's just an avatar and name.

Don't worry about it Boogy Laughing

Avatar of kco
GooseberryFiddich wrote:
[COMMENT DELETED]

having a second thought ?

Avatar of GooseberryFiddich

Ha ha ha.  Tally ho kco, your comment made me chuckle.  Not at all old egg, I sent a personal message to the mysterious Sexy-Sunshine.  I am one of nature's trusters.  A person comes along with a stylish avatar and a charming name and I say "Whatho, this looks like my kind of thing."

Whispers can be heard about the hallways, "Gooseberry is being duped.  He has been taken in hook line and sinker."  "Pooh" is my response to that.  I am an absolute duffer at chess but wish to excel and Sexy-Sunshine must know a certain amount of beans because look at the rating.

One need not be a master to teach, merely more experienced than the student.  On top of that, there is the adventure of it all and Sexy-Sunshine is likely a marvellous person, so all in all, why not say I.

For the record, I wish you every success Sexy-Sunshine in your endeavours.

Avatar of VLaurenT

NM linlaoda offers some free coaching in his group. I believe WGM Abrayamev also does some member analysis.

You can also post games in the Analysis forum and get valuable feedback from strong chess players for free (though you have to sift out some of the contributions)

Avatar of ConnorMacleod_151

This is better Laughing

Avatar of I-AM-YOUR-GRANDPA
hicetnunc wrote:

I'm a good chess player, and I'm probably stronger than you'll ever be. I also don't need to hide behind a bunch of false identities or pretend I'm a master to share my chess ideas.

 

For the record, I'm also happily married, father of three, and I don't have spots on my face :-)

Thats funnnyLaughing