Getting over 1400 - Chess Forums - Page 5

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#81

polarbear i think you are the best feature of chess.com just saying

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#82

PolarBearAttakk wrote:

B1ZMARK wrote:

unfortunately when there are arguments like these, the only way to win is to get other people's support...

Now you're contradicting yourself again. You went from making a premise that was proven false. Instead of having enough integrity to admit that you were wrong, you simply change the subject onto something else. No wonder your chess is still so weak after all these years.

Ah, I'm afraid you've made a SLIGHT inaccuracy. You see, their premise was never proven false.

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#83

Ah PolarBear, old bean, someday you may become an actually good troller. You have a tiny bit of potential.

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#84

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

B1ZMARK wrote:

unfortunately when there are arguments like these, the only way to win is to get other people's support...

Now you're contradicting yourself again. You went from making a premise that was proven false. Instead of having enough integrity to admit that you were wrong, you simply change the subject onto something else. No wonder your chess is still so weak after all these years.

ah, sorry, I couldn't hear you. That post was made right after you posted, so I didn't get to read it. Don't worry! I've responded in full. My chess may still be weak, but at least it isn't as weak as before! and you can't even use "years" because I haven't even had my 2nd year anniversary yet!

1100-2300 in two years! Let that be enough evidence.

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#85

PolarBearAttakk wrote:

B1ZMARK wrote:

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

B1ZMARK wrote:

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

This is why this site needs to create a BLOCK feature that actually works. I blocked these little lackey prepubescent trolls but they still keep harassing.

these little prepubescent trolls were having a normal discussion before... if being a mature adult is anything like your attitude, then I'd gladly be a troll.

No actually they weren't. They didn't even post a single topical comment in this thread. They posted only to harass and annoy. I'm the one who was posting on topic giving advice to the OP.

Go pad your fake little blitz rating some more. Hopefully nobody notices that your REAL rating is so embarassingly low, lol.

"I'm the only one who was posting giving advice to the OP"

"Be my student, I guarantee 1800 in 6 months" was probably the most helpful. The rest is you insulting other peoples bullet chess ratings, which the chess community has pretty much established to be inaccurate to your real strength.

I'm sure advice from 2600+ GMs are the only kind of people who are qualified to give advice to a 1400!

You're misquoting me. You changed my words. I didn't say "only". You're a liar and a cheat in argument just as you are in chess.

So their not a liar lol.

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#86

sholomsimon hat geschrieben:

B1ZMARK wrote:

sholomsimon hat geschrieben:

Is there a way to report this pissing contest? Ruined a perfectly good thread.

fortunately yes! click on their name, go to the more drop down box, and click report! if you can read, you can do it.

Now, my record is five meters. What's yours?

Done. Thanks.

Five meters, eh? If that was ever the case with me, those days are long gone . . .

You'll have to work hard!

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#87

polarbear what's you favorite anime?

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#88

huh i thought that was correct usage of the word their as well...

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#89

To sum up this thread, anyone over 1400 is qualified to give their advice.

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#90

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

JackRoach wrote:

PolarBearAttakk wrote:

B1ZMARK wrote:

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

B1ZMARK wrote:

PolarBearAttakk hat geschrieben:

This is why this site needs to create a BLOCK feature that actually works. I blocked these little lackey prepubescent trolls but they still keep harassing.

these little prepubescent trolls were having a normal discussion before... if being a mature adult is anything like your attitude, then I'd gladly be a troll.

No actually they weren't. They didn't even post a single topical comment in this thread. They posted only to harass and annoy. I'm the one who was posting on topic giving advice to the OP.

Go pad your fake little blitz rating some more. Hopefully nobody notices that your REAL rating is so embarassingly low, lol.

"I'm the only one who was posting giving advice to the OP"

"Be my student, I guarantee 1800 in 6 months" was probably the most helpful. The rest is you insulting other peoples bullet chess ratings, which the chess community has pretty much established to be inaccurate to your real strength.

I'm sure advice from 2600+ GMs are the only kind of people who are qualified to give advice to a 1400!

You're misquoting me. You changed my words. I didn't say "only". You're a liar and a cheat in argument just as you are in chess.

So their not a liar lol.

What does the word "their" mean? Do you even know? This is a simple word taught in early elementary school yet you still can't figure it out. For those who doesn't want to admit that chess rating and intelligence are closely associated, you're a perfect case in point of how they are!

Actually you are correct here. Words like "their" and "there", "effect" and "Affect" cause so much trouble, standardized tests in the US like the ACT and SAT have them in their english sections. Very sad.

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#91

wait so saying "their not a liar" is inccorect?

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#92

RorschachTest1 hat geschrieben:

wait so saying "their not a liar" is inccorect?

yeah, it's supposed to be "they're"

They are not a liar = They're not a liar.

Although that in itself isn't grammatically correct because "they" refers to a plural while "a liar" refers to a singular

but if you want to be gender neutral it's fine.

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#93

Hey, what do you guys mean?

I was talking posessive obviously.

Their "not a liar" is very funny. That was what I was trying to say.

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#94

sounds like our buddy Henrik Danielsen 2.0 went offline... or maybe he unfollowed.

sndeww

Mar 4, 2021

0

#95

JackRoach hat geschrieben:

Hey, what do you guys mean?

I was talking posessive obviously.

Their "not a liar" is very funny. That was what I was trying to say.

But he has a point! We were doing pipi in our pampers while he was beating players much stronger than us! And "b"zmark is just a nobody to him, just a pathetic crying looser who whines about every little truth I fart out ( remember what he say about the caro cann!! ) He deserves to have a good name in his entire chess career, everyone should take a look at his two fide rated tourneys he's played, and let that be a lesson to the doubters! God bless with true! True will never die! Liers will be kicked off...

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#96

well, that's a bummer. also i have Grammarly now, and I will catch polarbear in the future if they slip up

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#97

Yeah. He's obviously superior in every way, shape, and form.

It was all I could do not to beg for mercy.

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#98

what if polarbear is just secretly one of those kids who desperately want's to get 10,000 views... imagine that.

JackRoach

Mar 4, 2021

0

#99

RorschachTest1: If you have Grammarly, then how much do you know of the ad from memory?

The one that starts with, "Fridays are not that easy."

RorschachTest1

Mar 4, 2021

0

#100

hmmm i don't remember that one...