gm mistakes?

I was just kind of wondering, since I feel really good when I play like 50 mostly excellent moves with maybe 2-4 inaccuracies and 1 or no more than 2 mistakes, what is typical for a gm game analyzed with chess.com? Would it be remotely similar? Or would it be more like 1 inaccuracy per 5 games and 1 mistake per 20 or something rediculous like that?

Oh - also I sometimes don’t agree with the analysis- especially when I notice there was a mate in 2 or 3 at the very end instead of like a pawn capture for example - I feel like there shouldn’t be any ??s in the recommended lines :)

Haha - I’ve often wondered that too - how much money can one make at the master/im level. Anyway - this was meant to be a lighthearted thread - but also serious question - (since I can’t be bothered to analyze gm games myself) would it be the case that computers would generally find 1 or 2 things they somewhat disagree with? Obviously blunders would be pretty rare, but I do know they happen from a chessmaster10 game of josh waitzkin’s where he and his opponent had their rooks both hanging on adjacent squares for a full turn and didn’t notice until after the game - it would have been an easy win if either had noticed their rook could just take the rook literally on the next square.

I dislike the analysis tool for the same reason. When I'm clearly winning in the endgame and find a winning path that is let's say +5.00 for the winning side, the analysis will say I made a blunder b/c I didn't choose the move that is +20.00 for the winning side. You pick a winning move but is deemed as an inaccuracy, mistake, or even a blunder.