yup
Guess the Elo

One of the big moments for me was on move 56 white didn't take the pawn... which means time pressure... which means white spotted that 46.Rxa3 was bad in time pressure, so lower than 1800 would be surprising to me.
Unfortunately I feel like the first 15 moves of the game could have been played by just about any rating... except for black's f5, which is silly, and then a few minor middlegame decisions makes me think less than 2000.
So that's why I chose that range.
makes sense, but aside from the opening, i think the rest of the game was pretty good quality (with time trouble of course
Nf6 and in general playing on the kingside by white was a bit odd to me. I think a queenside pawn break was better. Meanwhile black was lost out of the opening... so it's hard for me to rate it too high.
But it's only blitz so... yeah, it's hard for me to guess... I probably guessed too low again.

One of the big moments for me was on move 56 white didn't take the pawn... which means time pressure... which means white spotted that 46.Rxa3 was bad in time pressure, so lower than 1800 would be surprising to me.
Unfortunately I feel like the first 15 moves of the game could have been played by just about any rating... except for black's f5, which is silly, and then a few minor middlegame decisions makes me think less than 2000.
So that's why I chose that range.
makes sense, but aside from the opening, i think the rest of the game was pretty good quality (with time trouble of course
Nf6 and in general playing on the kingside by white was a bit odd to me. I think a queenside pawn break was better. Meanwhile black was lost out of the opening... so it's hard for me to rate it too high.
But it's only blitz so... yeah, it's hard for me to guess... I probably guessed too low again.
every body plays wierd sometimes, just look at my recent losing streak, im just straight up losing before move 20

Oh, definitely. If you took my worst games maybe people would be guessing nothing higher than 1500
nice

can someone pls tell me when the answer is going to come out cuz i cant stand waiting for the answer

The correct rating is 1951. Here is the link to the game: https://www.chess.com/game/live/5543093389
Now for the scores...
@JackRoach gets 20 points
@llama47 scores 14 points
@darkbrah earns 7 points
@faleba gets 4 points
last, but not least @CrusaderKing1 scores 2 points

@Free-de-la-hoy2, you were late, but you were still fast enough to score some points. You get 2 points along with @CrusaderKing1.

my first guess (1900) is the same as Jacks guess (1900) so how come he gets more points and leaderboard pls

my first guess (1900) is the same as Jacks guess (1900) so how come he gets more points and leaderboard pls
Your other guesses were worse than Jack's. I scored based on each guess.
I'd be surprised if the ratings for that one were over 2000... but it's hard to tell with blitz
I'll guess 1700 1800 2000
they played really well, i'd say 2100 at least
I've been consistently guessing too low, so maybe that's right.
I feel like if I saw 3 games + time stamps I could guess pretty well. I start doubting myself when it's just one game... but I guess that's part of the fun.