Guess the Elo

imma do it @darkbrah7653

Time Control: 5 minutes for both sides

but on my own forum, not here

nvm lol. He did it

550, 675 and 825. those are my guesses

Rating ranges are not allowed. 

After 38.Bxh6 I checked for 1-0 or 0-1 because I still wasn't sure who would win.

So about that bad

400, 500, 600

Rating ranges aren't allowed...

... but you can guess 3 numbers and proximity yields points so...

... you kinda do get a range

I'm 1200 blitz and i've never played like that and neither do my opponents play like that

600 700 800

Meh, I wouldn't be surprised if black were higher rated. Tactics like 12...Nxf3 are pure luck at this level. They just play random captures or checks and hope they work... so we have to ignore that stuff.

What we can look at are things like who tried to develop in the opening?
Well white made a lot of pawns moves so I'm not convinced he's better than black at that.

Who made more simple 1 move blunders?
I didn't count, but moves like 26.Rxd5 and then not capturing the undefended bishop that the rook is literally touching is pretty bad.

And black's move, 22...Bc8, while objectively ridiculous, shows that black was trying to set up a discovered attack... which is a lot more advanced than random checks and captures.

So I feel like white got a little lucky going a piece ahead early, and then (miraculously) ended up in an endgame a piece ahead.

So sure, maybe white is higher rated, but my impression of black was a little better to be honest.

750, 850, 958

Although...

23.Rd1 was good (trying to use all his pieces).

In general white did better at that... so maybe white is the better player after all.

I'd want to see how black does when he doesn't accidentally play such an awkward opening development.

I say 750-950. They blundered quite a bit, but not as much as someone below 600. 

308, 593, 702.

400, 500, 580

500,700,900

when will the scores come out?