has Magnus ever gotten a 100% accuracy?

Sort:
Avatar of lucaszheng2026

You might know if you're a grandmaster

Avatar of Fr3nchToastCrunch

I think he once got a legitimate 99.9% on here in a 20-ish move game, which is probably about as you close as a human can get (barring quick checkmate traps), though I probably wouldn't be able to find the game if I tried.

Avatar of lucaszheng2026

hm ok thanks for telling

Avatar of Sightigh
99.9% is not as close as you can get. I got 100% in one of my games. So if I can, I bet Magnus can
Avatar of lucaszheng2026

hm ok

Avatar of Sigma-rizz-arth

Dudes, he has definetly got 100% in at least 1 game, ez topic chat,

Avatar of Sigma-rizz-arth

eh, magipi why you put a thumbs down reaction to my comment?

Avatar of fad0177

magnus is so cool

Avatar of MariasWhiteKnight

You do realize that accuracy is some b.s. rating that changes all the time ?

Depending upon which engine was used and how much time was invested in finding moves.

So no, you cannot play a "100% game". Ever. You can only play a "100% game for this engine and that precision/time invested". Somebody reevaluating will get a different result unless they pick the exact engine and exact time investment you picked the first time.

It also highly depends upon the game itself. In some positions the move Stockfish picks highly fluctuates, because there are many alternative moves that all work well. In others Stockfish picks a move and stays with it, no matter how deep you compute. If your game is full of the later positions and has hardly any of the former, getting a 100% game is much easier.

Bottom line, stop fussing about "accuracy".