Have you seen anything more disastrous?

Sort:
SharmaPawan
Stanya

That was just a bad all around game. No one did very well so yeah it was pretty disatrious.

wyh2013

It was okay SP,his pawns idea failed him and he might go for a check but instead he sacrificed all his materials

vik9612

Well, that style of play is typical chesscube!

where i have a rating of 700 higher than here.

StrategicPlay
fuoaded wrote:

33. Qxa8+ actually wins for white 

34. Qxa8+, you mean? (Because White was in check, then)

Agreed, White had WAY many ideas for winning. It was mostly the time pressure that killed. Both sides played bad. It was all because of time pressure that you would have during a 3|0 game. You can't afford to think for long. Wink

StrategicPlay
vik9612 wrote:

Well, that style of play is typical chesscube!

where i have a rating of 700 higher than here.

Never been on chesscube.. are people there too concerned about time?

ShyamGopal

nope,they are losers,chess.com is the best