There is now way of telling what technology will be capable of in 50 years or so. So who knows, we'll just have to wait and see what new developments will bring.
However, if chess would ever be solved strongly, in such a way that you could say (as with checkers now for example) 1. e4 draws, 1.d4 loses (just naming a random example), I wouldn't really look forward to that day. That being besides the point.
Offcourse it wouldn't ruin the pleasure of over the board play, just you and another amateur playing eachother, however, it would take away a lot of the romanticism knowing that whatever position you're in, of every move it can be said it wins, draws or loses...
But we are still far away from such a day, so let's just keep on playing and improving ourselves
I don't think so. People still play checkers don't they? Moreover, children still play tic-tac-toe! I, myself, used to enjoy this game when I was younger... before discovering it always draws when played properly. Tic-tac-toe has already been solved and its solution is so simple any children can understand.
It won't happen the same thing with chess because even if someday a computer solves it, as with checkers, that solution will be so complex that no person will be able to understand and apply in a game. People will be able to have fun with chess as well as nowadays.
But if you think that mistery and sense of infinity are important for the soul of the game, don't worry, it will take much more time to later on solve Fischer Random Chess, Capablanca Chess, Transcendental Chess...
Yes! No more discussion! It displeases the great dalmatinac!