In 2005, Jan Pinski classified 7 d5 as a dubious move and gave the reply as 7...Nce7, citing an 1841 correspondence game. Don't forget that White is down a pawn.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140626192818/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen78.pdf
In 2005, Jan Pinski classified 7 d5 as a dubious move and gave the reply as 7...Nce7, citing an 1841 correspondence game. Don't forget that White is down a pawn.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140626192818/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen78.pdf
yes that move definitely seems to lose the initiative for white as it creates a locked center and deadens white's light squared bishop you may play nce7 as has been said, then develop the other knight castle and try to play for the f5 lever with advantage.
In 2005, Jan Pinski classified 7 d5 as a dubious move and gave the reply as 7...Nce7, citing an 1841 correspondence game. Don't forget that White is down a pawn.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140626192818/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen78.pdf
Not only that, but by playing d5 white closed off the attacking diagonal for his bishop.
nce7 is fine. In fact, you might even follow with f5- Nf6 - castles
Have tried to look about this line and didn't found.
I have went (I the black )step by step until the opp. do me 7.d5 , and it seems this makes me lose a piece.
1.
e4
e5
2.
Nf3
Nc6
3.
Bc4
Bc5
4.
b4
Bxb4
5.
c3
Ba5
6.
d4
d6
7.
d5
Nd4
8.
Nxd4
exd4