blueemu wrote:
TS_theWoodiest wrote:
24 wins and 11 draws out of 74 games is probably pretty close to the expected win rate of a 1700-1800 player vs 2000 rated competition.
A 200-point rating gap equates to 3-to-1 odds or a 75-25 split in results.
That would be 14 wins and 9 draws out of 74 games.
There is a clear excess of more than 10 wins over expectations, assuming 1800 vs 2000 rating.
If it was 1750 vs 2050, the excess is even greater.
I trust your info, but I suspect that is based on the traditional FIDE Elo system, not the system that chess.com uses. Also, his peak rating was 1870 so it would make sense that he performed a bit higher than an 1800 during his rise to that rating if the win probabilities are similar between the two rating systems.
my friend @gunnersroadto1000 i played a lot, for every 10 games he won 5 drew 1-2 and lost 3-4
so i doubt his "statistics" are correct
My "statistics" are easy to lookup. I went to that account, to rapid games and sorted by a minimum rating of 2000.