my friend @gunnersroadto1000 i played a lot, for every 10 games he won 5 drew 1-2 and lost 3-4
so i doubt his "statistics" are correct
How long does it take you to reach 2000?
Sort:
@AngryPuffer says he owns "SamuelAjedrez95" account. That says it all. Pretending and argument closed.
AngryPuffer wrote:
my friend @gunnersroadto1000 i played a lot, for every 10 games he won 5 drew 1-2 and lost 3-4
so i doubt his "statistics" are correct
My "statistics" are easy to lookup. I went to that account, to rapid games and sorted by a minimum rating of 2000.
blueemu wrote:
TS_theWoodiest wrote:
24 wins and 11 draws out of 74 games is probably pretty close to the expected win rate of a 1700-1800 player vs 2000 rated competition.
A 200-point rating gap equates to 3-to-1 odds or a 75-25 split in results.
That would be 14 wins and 9 draws out of 74 games.
There is a clear excess of more than 10 wins over expectations, assuming 1800 vs 2000 rating.
If it was 1750 vs 2050, the excess is even greater.
I trust your info, but I suspect that is based on the traditional FIDE Elo system, not the system that chess.com uses. Also, his peak rating was 1870 so it would make sense that he performed a bit higher than an 1800 during his rise to that rating if the win probabilities are similar between the two rating systems.
24 wins and 11 draws out of 74 games is probably pretty close to the expected win rate of a 1700-1800 player vs 2000 rated competition.
A 200-point rating gap equates to 3-to-1 odds or a 75-25 split in results.
That would be 14 wins and 9 draws out of 74 games.
There is a clear excess of more than 10 wins over expectations, assuming 1800 vs 2000 rating.
If it was 1750 vs 2050, the excess is even greater.