How much would a king be worth if it were not royal

Sort:
Avatar of JoeMamaForever420

i would say 3-5 points

Avatar of tygxc

A non-royal king should be comparable in worth to a knight.

Avatar of AntiEttette

more than knight, less than queen prob 4 , 5 points

Avatar of JoeMamaForever420

compared to rook?

Avatar of Nimzowitsch

In the Endgame, they say that the King is worth 4 Points.

Avatar of CraigIreland

It covers the same number of squares as a knight, but it has a more powerful attack pattern in certain situations. Can cover fewer squares than a bishop, but can visit twice as many. I'd say it's worth more than a knight or a lone bishop but less than half of a bishop pair. About 3½.

Avatar of aanval22

I've heard 4 points. The king is more valuable than a knight because it is easier to manœuvre and can control both light and dark squares at the same time. The king is also more valuable than a bishop because it can access every square on the board, and does not have the same difficulties as a knight. Also, in an endgame, the only time when kings are useful as pieces in the vast majority of games, the knight's ability to jump over other pieces is less relevant, so that increases the difference in value between a king and a knight. However, a king is less valuable than a rook because the rook is a long range piece and the king is not.

Avatar of CraigIreland

Someone should give it a go. Replace Black's Bishops with Kings which can't be checkmated. I'd like to see which side wins. If Black wins then the answer is 4 or more points. If White wins the answer is 3.5 or fewer points.

Avatar of blueemu
JoeMamaForever420 wrote:

i would say 3-5 points

Raw combat strength? About 4 points, correct.

Avatar of idilis
JoeMamaForever420 wrote:

How much would a king be worth if it were not royal

i would say 3-5 points

Not even sure what a non royal king is.  What would be the goal of this new game since I guess checkmate can't happen

Avatar of blueemu
idilis wrote:
JoeMamaForever420 wrote:

How much would a king be worth if it were not royal

i would say 3-5 points

Not even sure what a non royal king is.  What would be the goal of this new game since I guess checkmate can't happen

Attrition warfare, like in World War I.

The Last Pawn Standing wins.

Avatar of duntcare
CraigIreland wrote:

Someone should give it a go. Replace Black's Bishops with Kings which can't be checkmated. I'd like to see which side wins. If Black wins then the answer is 4 or more points. If White wins the answer is 3.5 or fewer points.

kings are strong also because of other pieces, other pieces are faster moving but less agile ig since king is a debuffed queen in a sense

Avatar of monkey-armory

How much is the guard I believe that is the fake I mean fairy piece equivalent of a king that cant be mated. 

Avatar of monkey-armory
TheCheesePhoenix wrote:

It's just a non-royal king and it's worth 3 pts on chess.com/variants games, as I stated earlier

Oh Ok thank you I am sorry i must have missed that comment.

Avatar of Marcyful

If the king could be captured like any other piece in the game? I'd say around 3 points.

Avatar of tygxc

A non-royal king and a king can checkmate a king.
So it should be worth more than 3 pawns.
The earlier mention of 4 pawns seems correct.

Avatar of Laskersnephew

Every question of this kind has the same answer: It depends on the position

Avatar of JoeMamaForever420

e