Perhaps of interest:

https://www.chess.com/article/view/can-anyone-be-an-im-or-gm

"... On the one hand, your play needs to be purposeful much of the time; the ability to navigate through many different types of positions needs to be yours; your ability to calculate variations and find candidate moves needs to be present in at least an embryonic stage. On the other hand, it will be heart-warming and perhaps inspiring to realize that you do not need to give up blunders or misconceptions or a poor memory or sloppy calculating habits; that you do not need to know all the latest opening variations, or even know what they are called. You do not have to memorize hundreds of endgame positions or instantly recognize the proper procedure in a variety of pawn structures.

[To play at a master level consistently] is not an easy task, to be sure ..., but it is a possible one. ..." - NM Peter Kurzdorfer (2015)

On improvement:

A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf

Studying Chess Made Easy by Andrew Soltis

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090448/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review750.pdf

100 Chess Master Trade Secrets by Andrew Soltis

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708094523/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review916.pdf

Bill Paterson said its best to play solo games until level of consistency increase. Try to calculate a position for thirty minutes that'll solve your problem

My computer broke

You seem to have some talent for chess. Nearly 1700 rating (1950 in Lessons) after only three years learning the game is pretty impressive.

A minor title such as FM, NM or IM is probably within your reach. Higher chess titles such as GM, super-GM and WC might already be beyond your grasp, though. The world-class players usually show unmistakable evidence of their ability by the time they are 12 or 13 years old.

My advice:

a) Continue your current chess study plan, it seems to be working.

b) Study tactics, model mates, pawn structures (and their effect on your choice of middle-game plan), endgames, general opening theory and a bit (not too much) of specific openings.

c) Play over games by Masters and Grandmasters, especially the old geezers from the early 20th century... chess was simpler then, and you might find the play easier to understand than complex modern play.

d) Play long games, against equal or better players. I suggest starting a few games at correspondence time-controls, such as 3 days per move. You can still move quickly if you like, but you can also think for hours if you choose to.

I'm around 2000 OTB (Canadian rating), or 2180 here on chess.com. I started playing in OTB tournaments in the 1970s... I'm an old fart. If you wanted to play an unrated game at three days per move, challenge me.

We can play some training games... both of us will benefit

"

how to progress to reach to IM title? Plz provide me perfect strategy"

I do not believe the nay-sayers that might say that at 23 you are "too old".   There is a lot of nonsense believed about having to start young to truly master a dificult skill.  The main reason that many such beliefs seem to be true is that peoploe believe them.  Change your beliefs and the shackles on what older people can do are removed.

But If you think that there is a "perfect strategy", or that anyone knows it, then you are not being objective enough to achieve your goal.  No-one even knows for sure, of all the exercises you can do, what works best and what is not so good (or even harmful).  In any case at least some of what you have to do varies from player to player.

And you cannot guarantee reaching a standard that has proved very difficult to attain, as is clear from the many millions that play chess, the smaller but still large number that take it seriously, and the very small percentage that ever gets close to a master title.

Even if someone knew a "perfect strategy" why do you think they would give away something so valuable to some unknown person on the Internet? Someone with big ambitions, but expecting to be spoon-fed on the way to achieving them?  That is not very realistic.  If I had the "perfect strategy" for achieving chess mastery I would have something that could make me financially independent for the rest of my life.  I would not give it away so casually.

The only sound advice I ever got was from GM Nigel Davies. "Immerse yourself in chess culture".

If you do that, and you love the game, you'll enjoy it for as long as you live.  But if your ambition is to achieve a high rating and a master title to boost your ego, but you do not have a genuine love for the game, then you will almost certainly fail ...

... and probably be unhappy as well

You needed a coach, a very good one, at least nationsl master to guide and train you. Some cc membet could type a thousand words or gives a list of books and videos. Fritz GUI with Komodo, Stockfish or Houdini and Chessbase are the next best thing to a very good coach.