PlayaRhapsody wrote:
Cheater_1 may I ask you a question?
What are you trying to gain from this?
A movie deal - I think Bruce Campbell would play him, with one of those twirly evil moustaches.
I am UNMATEABLE!!!
Sort:
Dec 29, 2008
0
#23
I know you feel you are unmatable.......................but there is someone out there for you.....................ego and all..............
Who is Bruce Campbell?
Dec 29, 2008
0
#25
alicesussex wrote:
Who is Bruce Campbell?
He's the most famous b-movie actor of all time :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Campbell
Dude, you must think we are idiots. You wouldn't get mated by Vishy, you would resign after he exploits you as just another Class A player (if even that good).
Thanks Maradonna
Dec 29, 2008
0
#28
bobbereight wrote:
Dude, you must think we are idiots. You wouldn't get mated by Vishy, you would resign after he exploits you as just another Class A player (if even that good).
And rightfully so: "If ANAND were to sit across from cheater_1 and his UNMATEABLE program CANNIBAL 37, he would LOSE."
At no point did he say that he could beat Anand 1-on-1, he clearly and specifically said he could with the aid of his computer program (though a computer might help as well :D)
Dec 29, 2008
0
#29
First off, PAUL211, here are my calculations regarding the games I have played.
I have played internet chess for a total of 13 years. 10 of those years were hardcore, meaning that I would play nearly EVERY SINGLE DAY, perhaps 360 days a year. Some of those days I was on from sun up to SUN UP. Yes that's right, I was logged on to a chess site for 24 hours at a time. I'd play a game here and there as the hours went by over the course of the 24 hours. MARATHON CHESS. Don't forget that I was one of the ORIGINATORS of chessbuddy. An auto 232 type of program that was JAVA based that would actually move the pieces for you as you sat and watched while you ate your lunch. I'd use Fritz as the engine and set it to search for one minute games and then watch it rip through people ALL DAY LONG without a loss...and without me ever having to move a piece. It is conservative to say that some days I played 20 games per hour for 18 hours. DO THE MATH. Some days I had 350 games under my belt. Of course, there were the days that I played 3 minute games and logged about 150 or so.
DO THE MATH. When I played speed chess, and there were YEARS that I only played games under 3 minutes, it's safe to say that 5 years X 360 days X an average of 200 games a day = 360,000 games. AND THAT'S just in 5 years. The other 5 were spent playing games under 15 minutes. I'll allow 150,000 games in those 5 years for a rough estimate of 500,000 games.
Ok, so what about the other 20 years (PRE INTERNET) that I played with friends and family. Some were tourney type games and some were quick games for fun. I'd say I averaged a dozen games a day--some more, some less. Round it off to 4000 or so games a year for 20 years. DO THE MATH. 80,000 games, give or take a few. I'm rounding DOWN here.
The way I see it is that I have AT THE VERY LEAST 580,000 games (CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE under my belt). I would put the figure closer to 750,000. So, I am correct at saying nearly a MILLION games to my credit. Granted, the vast majority were by an auto playing program with me doing nothing more than typing berating and snide comments to the hapless player at the other side of the connection. You ever try to win against fritz in a one minute game? It's frustrating. Not many people could last 20 moves.
Finally, many people ask why I even post these comments. What do I have to gain? Nothing. I'm not doing it for the fame or fortune. Cheating at chess is the ONE thing in life that I ever truly succeeded at. It is the one thing that didn't blow up in my face as everything else I have tried has done. It's my one victory. I guess you might say that I am bragging. Yes, that's it. It's who I am. Don't deny me that, please.
I'm the type of guy who (if I was filthy rich and famous) would go on an all night drinking binge, get behind the wheel of my Lamborghini, probably kill someone accidentally, then buy my way out of jail time and then continue my extravagant ways without blinking an eye. If I were a woman that had good looks, I'd exploit myself to gain whatever I wanted. I'd use you. I'd use you as an ATM. I'd cheat on you with your own brother as you were at work. Once I have something that is worth something, I FLAUNT IT. Good or bad, I use it. It's who I am. I am not perfect. I have many flaws. But when it comes to chess. I REIGN as the Universe's best player BAR NONE.
p.s. I have even emailed Carnegie Mellon University as well as IBM and challenged ANY program they had laying around. They refused.
cheater_1 wrote:
Fellow chess freaks. I have decided that you have EARNED another post from me. Many people here are taking my advice and posting CREDIBLE posts. The lies have been dwindling. I have been noticing alot of CITATIONS from credible sources when you all decide to post something that cannot be taken for granted. Good job. Here is your reward.
Please refer to The Big Showdown group vote chess match between Team cheater_1 and Light Force as I will be using it to back up my claims. Team Lightforce was the only team on this site that had the courage to go toe to toe with me, so please give them a hand.
As you all know, I possess chess skills that far exceed even ANAND. I can hear you all laughing now, but it is true. If ANAND were to sit across from cheater_1 and his UNMATEABLE program CANNIBAL 37, he would LOSE. As you all know, in my nearly 1 million online games, I have never been checkmated once and have beaten 3 GMs in my life, and the GM games were 40/120. LEGIT TOURNEY GAMES.
Now, listen up. I am not making the claim that I will never lose a game on time, or take a loss because I was FORCED to resign as I was in our first vote chess game by team chess.com (bullies that they are). I am saying that I simply cannot be checkmated in a game of chess by any HUMAN, team of humans, computer program, team of computer programs, or any combination of the previous.
As many long time members of this site know, I employ my own chess knowledge (1950 uscf with 30 years of playing the game), A super chess program that I wrote that knows how to draw even the toughest of opponents (it's win percentage is 3% its loss percentage is ZERO%, and its draw percentage is 97%), and an extensive understanding of psychology that allows me to manipulate my opponents. Combine these elements and you have me...THE UNMATEABLE ONE.
Please refer to The Big Showdown now. Look at the board. Do you all remember my number one chess COMMANDMENT? ATTACK THE CENTER NO MATTER WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOU. Ignore attacks on your pieces elsewhere. DO NOT defend in ANY circumstance unless there is a check upon you. Look at my pieces PUNISHING the center. Look at how my king is running about without a care. I am dividing and conquering. Look at my development, it is like a spear pointing at their heart. Look at my IMPENETRABLE pawn wall. I dont care a hoot about his king. Going for the king is not what it's about.....at this point.
Now, Team lightforce is no slouch. Last I heard there were dozens of people on that team, many running deep fritz and rybka. Look at how just little old me and my homemade program LURED them in. Like a spider luring an ant. They want my king so bad that they and their "commercial" chess programs couldn't see what I had in store for them. Do you see it? They just LOST their rook when I get my turn. I am attacking the Queen AND the ROOK. Too bad I'm not planning on going on vacation so you can DENY me a vacation and take the "win" like team chess.com did. SORRY.
17 moves into the game and it's all but OVER. DOZENS of top notch computer programs couldnt manage to pull off even a draw with me. Heck, my win percentage may go from 3% to 3.5% now.
Remember my rules. NEVER DEFEND, The top chess players in the world were NEVER known for their defensive playing. Develop your pieces toward the center, or at least have them attacking central squares. The fianchetto is more often than not the kiss of death when developing pieces. Push to the center, good things will happen. King safety is overrated. Use the king as bait. Bring him into the fight and gain an advantage.
I suspect team lightforce will resign shortly. When they do, is there any TEAM out there that has the GUTS to go toe to toe with the UNMATEABLE ONE?
I want you to know this, cheater_1. Yes, there may have been players who used Rybka and Fritz (not me, I lost my copy), but they are only a FEW of the voters. Majority vs. Minority? I can safely say that if enough people used Fritz and Rybka, the game would look substantially different than it is now.
Yes, I applaud your program 'Cannibal'. It's a nice little program, I'm sure you and your friends spent quite some time working on bugs and perfecting it. I, being someone who dabbled in programming, simply can't get enough of watching your program give out moves in games. It astonishes and amazes me, so I give you kudos for making a legit program. That being said, I'm still going to have to call you out on the defeat of 3 GMs. After playing and studying with numerous GMs, I find this news very difficult to believe. Exactly who did you defeat? Sorry to disappoint, but I sincerely doubt Cannibal's ability to mate Anand. If it ever happens, let me know, lol.
God, I think what's worse is I think I know you. Not your personality, but your physical self. Your name isn't Bill, is it?
wow, such a long comment on the forums...
lol
Tiger-13 wrote:
wow, such a long comment on the forums...
It did turn out longer than I expected, lol
Dec 29, 2008
0
#34
ZERROGI. I will give out the name of one of the GM's. Maybe later I'll give out the others. Larry Chrisitansen. He is a US GM rated around 2500. I used Fritz on him back in the 90's at another chess site. The game was a one hour time limit and I was masquerading as another GM. I was regarded suspiciously at this chess website as my play was just too perfect. After my (fritz's) trouncing of Mr. Christiansen, I was banned from the site. Those arrogant &#$@@ *&@(@&@! think that if they get beat, it MUST have been a program.
Of course, my demeanor led to my getting banned. After I had won, I was put through the ringer, grilled with questions, a veritable inquisition. There were over 120 people watching this and they all ganged up on me. Remember, I was a "fellow GM". I just couldn't resist the comment, "Mr. Christiansen, I don't need a chess program to tell me to exchange my rook for your queen." HA. Such disrespect. Such gall. If this were real life, I would have been dismembered by the crowd. My account was deleted shortly thereafter, much to my joy.
Cheater One, honey, I am in love with you! I wish be your mate. I reject to belive you are realy un-mate-able! 
Dec 30, 2008
0
#37
Lydia, it is so. As to the other definition of mate, I have never been married. Yes it's true. I have not found one woman who would ever want to marry me. It is very difficult to spend an extended amount of time with me. Heck, even over the holiday season, my own MOTHER got into a verbal fight with me. She called me demanding and obstinate and basically cut my visit short on Christmas. MY OWN MOTHER!!!
Of course, Mother's are always right. I admitted my faults and backed down. Someone has to wash my dirty underwear every other weekend, so I have keep on good terms with Momma.
cheater_1 wrote:
ZERROGI. I will give out the name of one of the GM's. Maybe later I'll give out the others. Larry Chrisitansen. He is a US GM rated around 2500. I used Fritz on him back in the 90's at another chess site. The game was a one hour time limit and I was masquerading as another GM. I was regarded suspiciously at this chess website as my play was just too perfect. After my (fritz's) trouncing of Mr. Christiansen, I was banned from the site. Those arrogant &#$@@ *&@(@&@! think that if they get beat, it MUST have been a program.
Of course, my demeanor led to my getting banned. After I had won, I was put through the ringer, grilled with questions, a veritable inquisition. There were over 120 people watching this and they all ganged up on me. Remember, I was a "fellow GM". I just couldn't resist the comment, "Mr. Christiansen, I don't need a chess program to tell me to exchange my rook for your queen." HA. Such disrespect. Such gall. If this were real life, I would have been dismembered by the crowd. My account was deleted shortly thereafter, much to my joy.
Wow, you put my name in caps. Catchy.
I don't see why you won't give out the other names, or maybe Larry's your best story of the three? In either case, Fritz is a powerful program, even stronger now. Cannibal didn't win that game for you, Fritz did.(can't believe I'm having this kind of discussion in Chess) Unfortunately, or maybe fortunately, they were quick to catch you in the act. I wonder why Chess.com isn't as harsh on you as that site was?
Of course Christiansen was going to inquire about you, provided this even WAS Christiansen that you played against. It's the internetz, remember? He could've been faking too, lol. You "trounced" him, he wants to know the meaning behind your moves. Clever insult, probably would've said it myself under such pressure from questioning. Can I get a copy of the game, by the by?
cheater_1 wrote:
ZERROGI. I will give out the name of one of the GM's. Maybe later I'll give out the others. Larry Chrisitansen. He is a US GM rated around 2500. I used Fritz on him back in the 90's at another chess site. The game was a one hour time limit and I was masquerading as another GM. I was regarded suspiciously at this chess website as my play was just too perfect. After my (fritz's) trouncing of Mr. Christiansen, I was banned from the site. Those arrogant &#$@@ *&@(@&@! think that if they get beat, it MUST have been a program.
Of course, my demeanor led to my getting banned. After I had won, I was put through the ringer, grilled with questions, a veritable inquisition. There were over 120 people watching this and they all ganged up on me. Remember, I was a "fellow GM". I just couldn't resist the comment, "Mr. Christiansen, I don't need a chess program to tell me to exchange my rook for your queen." HA. Such disrespect. Such gall. If this were real life, I would have been dismembered by the crowd. My account was deleted shortly thereafter, much to my joy.
Pictures, or it did not happen. What was the site? Your former user-name? Would they back you up if I were to go and ask them of this? Surely they would not forget.
If there were 120 people watching, there are 122 witnesses. I think they would still remember.
Next time you fake a story, be sure to put in the part where "the site crashed/was cancelled/destroyed for some reason." That, or provide sources. None of this "it's confidential" crap.
Cheater_1 may I ask you a question?
What are you trying to gain from this?